Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.04015

Truth Predicate of Inductive Definitions and Logical Complexity of Infinite-Descent Proofs

Sohei Ito·Makoto Tatsuta
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Formal reasoning about inductively defined relations and structures is widely recognized not only for its mathematical interest but also for its importance in computer science, and has applications in verifying properties of programs and algorithms. Recently, several proof systems of inductively defined predicates based on sequent calculus including the cyclic proof system CLKID-omega and the infinite-descent proof system LKID-omega have attracted much attention. Although the relation among their provabilities has been clarified so far, the logical complexity of these systems has not been much studied. The infinite-descent proof system LKID-omega is an infinite proof system for inductive definitions and allows infinite paths in proof figures. It serves as a basis for the cyclic proof system. This paper shows that the logical complexity of the provability in LKID-omega is (Pi-1-1)-complete. To show this, first it is shown that the validity for inductive definitions in standard models is equivalent to the validity for inductive definitions in standard term models. Next, using this equivalence, this paper extends the truth predicate of omega-languages, as given in Girard's textbook, to inductive definitions by employing arithmetical coding of inductive definitions. This shows that the validity of inductive definitions in standard models is a (Pi-1-1) relation. Then, using the completeness of LKID-omega for standard models, it is shown that the logical complexity of the provability in LKID-omega is (Pi-1-1)-complete.

Explore related subjects

cs.LOcs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sohei Ito, Makoto Tatsuta. 2026-03-04. Truth Predicate of Inductive Definitions and Logical Complexity of Infinite-Descent Proofs. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.441.10

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

PICID: Proof-Driven Clause Learning in Neural Network Verification

Current Deep Neural Network (DNN) verifiers are typically designed to prioritize scalability over reliability. Reliability can be reinforced through the generation of proofs that are checkable by trusted, external proof checkers. To date, only a handful of verifiers support proof production; and these rely on verifier-specific formats, and balance between scalability, proof detail, and the trustworthiness of their proof checker. In this tool paper, we introduce PICID, a DNN verifier that produces proofs in the standard Alethe format for SMT solving, checkable by an independent checker. PICID implements a parallel CDCL(T) architecture that integrates the state-of-the-art, proof-producing CaDiCaL SAT solver with the Marabou DNN verifier. Furthermore, PICID leverages UNSAT proofs to derive conflict clauses. Our evaluation shows that PICID generates valid proofs in the vast majority of cases and significantly outperforms existing tools that produce comparable proofs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Confluence of conditional rewriting modulo

Sets of equations E play an important computational role in rewriting-based systems R. The equivalence relation =E induced by E introduces a partition of terms into E-equivalence classes on which rewriting computations, denoted ->R/E and called rewriting modulo E, are issued. This paper investigates confluence of ->R/E, usually called E-confluence, for conditional rewriting-based systems, where rewriting steps are determined by conditional rules. We rely on Jouannaud and Kirchner's framework to investigate confluence of an abstract relation R modulo an abstract equivalence relation E on a set A. We show how to particularize such a framework to be used with conditional systems. Then, we show how to define appropriate finite sets of conditional pairs to prove and disprove E-confluence. We introduce (i) Logic-based Conditional Critical Pairs, which do not require the use of (often infinitely many) E-unifiers to provide a finite representation of the local peaks considered in the abstract framework. We also introduce (ii) parametric Conditional Variable Pairs which are essential to deal with conditional rules in the analysis of E-confluence. Finally, we introduce (iii) Down Conditional Pairs which are often necessary to disprove E-confluence. Our results apply to well-known classes of rewriting-based systems, improving on previous results. As for unconditional systems, our results apply to Equational Term Rewriting Systems, first investigated by Huet and then by Jouannaud, and Jouannaud and Kirchner, among others. As for conditional systems, our results also apply to conditional rewrite theories and Maude.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. Therefore, we contribute a framework for verified numerical methods in Isabelle/HOL based on ITrees. Our user-friendly specification language enables the direct declaration of numerical programs that can be annotated with variants and invariants for reasoning about correctness specifications. The generated verification conditions can be discharged via automated proof methods and lemmas from the HOL-Analysis library. The ITrees foundation interacts with Isabelle's code generator to export source code. This provides an end-to-end path from formal specifications with machine-checked guarantees to executable sources. We illustrate the process of modelling numerical methods and demonstrate the effectiveness of the verification by focusing on two well-known methods, the bisection method and the fixed-point iteration method. We also contribute crucial extensions to the libraries of formalised mathematics required for this objective: higher-order derivatives and Taylor's theorem in Peano form. Finally, we qualitatively evaluate the use of the framework for verifying numerical methods.

cs.LO↗