Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.07280

Automated Lower Bounds for Bilinear Complexity over Finite Fields

Abstract

We present a general, automated framework for proving lower bounds on the bilinear complexity (tensor rank) of multiplication problems over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$. The framework is parameterized only by the multiplication tensor and by a group of rank-preserving symmetries acting on one argument: it classifies the subspaces of the argument into orbits under the group, runs a dynamic program over the orbits combining four lower-bound techniques, and emits a proof certificate that a verifier rechecks, typically faster than the search. Instantiating the framework for matrix multiplication, we improve the lower bounds for three small formats over $\mathbb{F}_2$, most notably showing that the bilinear complexity of multiplying two $3 \times 3$ matrices over $\mathbb{F}_2$ is at least $20$, raising the bound of $19$ that had stood since Bläser (2003). Instantiating it for polynomial multiplication, we obtain eighteen new lower bounds over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and $\mathbb{F}_3$, for the full product, cyclic convolution, and the truncated (modulo $x^N$) and negacyclic (modulo $x^N+1$) products. Every bound is backed by a machine-checkable certificate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chengu Wang. 2026-08-29. Automated Lower Bounds for Bilinear Complexity over Finite Fields. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07280

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

Turing complete Navier-Stokes steady states via cosymplectic geometry

In this article, we construct stationary solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations on certain Riemannian $3$-manifolds that exhibit Turing completeness, in the sense that they are capable of performing universal computation. This universality arises on manifolds admitting nonvanishing harmonic 1-forms, thus showing that computational universality is not obstructed by viscosity, provided the underlying geometry satisfies a mild cohomological condition. The proof makes use of a correspondence between nonvanishing harmonic $1$-forms and cosymplectic geometry, which extends the classical correspondence between Beltrami fields and Reeb flows on contact manifolds.

math.DG

Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes

This is a set of lecture notes suitable for a Master's course on quantum computation and information from the perspective of theoretical computer science. The first version was written in 2011, with many extensions and improvements in subsequent years. The first 10 chapters cover the circuit model and the main quantum algorithms (Deutsch-Jozsa, Simon, Shor, Hidden Subgroup Problem, Grover, quantum walks, Hamiltonian simulation and HHL). They are followed by 4 chapters about complexity, 4 chapters about distributed ("Alice and Bob") settings, a chapter about quantum machine learning, one about stabilizer states and Clifford circuits, and a final chapter about quantum error correction. Appendices A and B give a brief introduction to the required linear algebra and some other mathematical and computer science background. All chapters come with exercises, with some hints provided in Appendix C.

quant-ph

Hardness of Approximation of Rank Aggregation on Ulam Metric

We study the approximability of rank aggregation under the Ulam metric. In the \emph{Ulam median} problem, the goal is to find a permutation minimizing the sum of its Ulam distances to the input permutations, while in the \emph{Ulam center} problem the objective is to minimize the maximum such distance. Both problems are known to be NP-hard, but no explicit approximation hardness was previously known. We prove that, for every $\varepsilon>0$, it is NP-hard to approximate either Ulam median or Ulam center within a factor of $51/50-\varepsilon$, even when the input consists of only four permutations. We further show that unless P = NP, neither problem admits a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme. The hardness result for Ulam median is established via a reduction from MAX-E3-LIN-2. The corresponding hardness for Ulam center is then obtained through a reduction from Ulam median.

cs.CC