Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.07616

SABR Type Libor (Forward) Market Model (SABR/LMM) with time-dependent skew and smile

Osamu Tsuchiya
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Volatility Skew and Smile of Interest Rate products (Swaption and Caplet) are represented by SABR (Stochastic Alpha Beta Rho model). So, the Interest Rate derivatives model for pricing the callable exotic swaps should be comparable to the SABR volatility surface. In the interest rate derivatives models, Libor Market Model (LMM) (in a post-Libor world, Forward Market Model (FMM)) is one of the most popular models used in the market. So, there are many attempts to develop LMMs that are comparable to the SABR surface. It is called SABR/LMM. There are many references for SABR/LMM, but most of them only treat SABR/LMM, which is not flexible enough to be used practically in global banks. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive definition of SABR/LMM and a complete description of how it is to be implemented.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MFq-fin.PR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Osamu Tsuchiya. 2026-03-08. SABR Type Libor (Forward) Market Model (SABR/LMM) with time-dependent skew and smile. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Modeling interest rate swap volatility with GARCH processes

We examine the conditional volatility dynamics of the USD 1Yx10Y forward swap rate using GARCH(1,1), GJR-GARCH(1,1), and a two-regime Markov-switching GARCH (MSGARCH) model. The analysis uses daily data from 2007 to 2023 and incorporates market-implied measures (ATM swaption volatility and the SRVIX in- dex) together with a broad set of diagnostic tests. Standard GARCH and GJR- GARCH models show stable short-run parameters, but the intercept ω varies markedly across rolling windows, causing instability in the implied long-run vari- ance. This pattern, confirmed by the Nyblom test, motivates adopting a regime- switching specification. MSGARCH mitigates this issue by keeping regime-specific parameters stable and capturing time variation through filtered regime probabili- ties. It delivers the highest log-likelihood and lowest AIC, whereas BIC favours the more parsimonious GJR-GARCH. One-step-ahead backtesting indicates comparable short-horizon accuracy across models, but MSGARCH offers a clearer structural in- terpretation by isolating high- and low-volatility regimes aligned with major market events.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

First order Martingale model risk and semi-static hedging

We investigate model risk distributionally robust sensitivities for functionals on the Wasserstein space when the underlying model is constrained to the martingale class and/or is subject to constraints on the first marginal law. Our results extend the findings of Bartl, Drapeau, Obloj \& Wiesel \cite{bartl2021sensitivity} and Bartl \& Wiesel \cite{bartlsensitivityadapted} by introducing the minimization of the distributionally robust problem with respect to semi-static hedging strategies. We provide explicit characterizations of the model risk (first order) optimal semi-static hedging strategies. The distributional robustness is analyzed both in terms of the adapted Wasserstein metric and the more relevant standard Wasserstein metric.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Fixed-Income Pricing and the Replication of Liabilities

This paper develops a model-free framework for static fixed-income pricing and the replication of liability cash flows. The absence of static arbitrage across a universe of fixed-income instruments is equivalent to the existence of a strictly positive discount curve reproducing all observed prices. Linear programming duality then identifies the least-cost super-replication price with the largest value that any admissible discount curve assigns to the liability, so that the resulting bounds are attained and cannot be improved. Complementary slackness confines over-replication to dates that the optimal discount vector prices at zero, and a least-cost portfolio matches the liability exactly at no fewer dates than the rank of the cash-flow matrix. We also obtain generic uniqueness of that portfolio, an interpolation between quadratic hedging and super-replication, and a static treatment of swap--repo strategies. On US Treasury cross-sections the observed prices violate the law of one price, so that a discount curve must be estimated rather than bootstrapped; the least-cost portfolio then matches an annuity liability at almost every cash-flow date.

q-fin.MF↗