Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.09031

ImpedanceDiffusion: Diffusion-Based Global Path Planning for UAV Swarm Navigation with Generative Impedance Control

Faryal Batool·Yasheerah Yaqoot·Muhammad Ahsan Mustafa·Roohan Ahmed Khan·Aleksey Fedoseev·Dzmitry Tsetserukou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Safe swarm navigation in cluttered indoor environment requires long-horizon planning, reactive obstacle avoidance, and adaptive compliance. We propose ImpedanceDiffusion, a hierarchical framework that leverages image-conditioned diffusion-based global path planning with Artificial Potential Field (APF) tracking and semantic-aware variable impedance control for aerial drone swarms. The diffusion model generates geometric global trajectories directly from RGB images without explicit map construction. These trajectories are tracked by an APF-based reactive layer, while a VLM-RAG module performs semantic obstacle classification with 90% retrieval accuracy to adapt impedance parameters for mixed obstacle environments during execution. Two diffusion planners are evaluated: (i) a top-view long-horizon planner using single-pass inference and (ii) a first-person-view (FPV) short-horizon planner deployed via a two-stage inference pipeline. Both planners achieve a 100% trajectory generation rate across twenty static and dynamic experimental configurations and are validated via zero-shot sim-to-real deployment on Crazyflie 2.1 drones through the hierarchical APF-impedance control stack. The top-view planner produces smoother trajectories that yield conservative tracking speeds of 1.0-1.2 m/s near hard obstacles and 0.6-1.0 m/s near soft obstacles. In contrast, the FPV planner generates trajectories with greater local clearance and typically higher speeds, reaching 1.4-2.0 m/s near hard obstacles and up to 1.6 m/s near soft obstacles. Across 20 experimental configurations (100 total runs), the framework achieved a 92% success rate while maintaining stable impedance-based formation control with bounded oscillations and no in-flight collisions, demonstrating reliable and adaptive swarm navigation in cluttered indoor environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Faryal Batool, Yasheerah Yaqoot, Muhammad Ahsan Mustafa, Roohan Ahmed Khan, Aleksey Fedoseev, Dzmitry Tsetserukou. 2026-03-10. ImpedanceDiffusion: Diffusion-Based Global Path Planning for UAV Swarm Navigation with Generative Impedance Control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗