Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.13913

Axiom Beta Implies Elementary Transfinite Recursion

Abstract

We show that $\mathbf{C}$, a weak theory of sets with Axiom Beta, proves the scheme of Elementary, or $Δ_0$ Transfinite Recursion and can generate, for every set, the corresponding relativized constructible hierarchy. We show that the theory $\mathbf{C}$ corresponds to Simpson's system $\mathbf{ATR}_0^\text{set}$ without the Axiom of Countability. In fact, $\mathbf{C}$ proves the totality of the Veblen function and of all primitive recursive set functions. In particular, this means our system $\mathbf{C}$ is equivalent to $\mathbf{PRS}ω+\text{Axiom Beta}$. We also establish an upper bound, though not a sharp one, for the $Σ_1$-definable functions of $\mathbf{C}$. Finally, we show that the variant of $\mathbf{C}$ in which the Finite Powerset Axiom is replaced by the closure under the rudimentary functions is a strictly weaker theory and no longer ensures the existence of the relativized constructible hierarchy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emanuele Frittaion, Giorgio G. Genovesi. 2026-07-14. Axiom Beta Implies Elementary Transfinite Recursion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13913

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO