Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.18243

Why Eight Percent of Benford Sequences Never Converge

Abstract

We study multi-digit correlations in Benford sequences b^n for integer bases 2 <= b <= 1000, measuring dependence via conditional mutual information (CMI). A resonance ratio derived from the continued fraction expansion of log_10(b) classifies bases into convergent and persistent regimes (Theorem 3.13): among 996 bases surveyed, 84 (8.4%) exhibit persistent correlations at sample depth N = 10,000, and extended computation to N = 200,000 confirms 53 (5.3%) as genuinely persistent. We prove that CMI deviation is bounded by the distribution error (Theorem 3.4); exhaustive computation across 2,988 test cases confirms that the effective scaling is quadratic, yielding a two-sided rate beta = 2 for bounded-type bases (conditional on a computationally verified Hessian positivity condition). The observed effective exponent across 774 convergent bases is beta_eff = 1.72 +/- 0.19, consistent with finite-sample corrections to the asymptotic rate. We conjecture that the persistence rate converges to 1/12, a prediction grounded in the Gauss-Kuzmin distribution of partial quotients. For persistent bases, the convergence threshold N_epsilon exceeds 10^6 at standard precision, rendering the asymptotic limit observationally irrelevant within our computational scope.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James M. Hyman. 2026-03-18. Why Eight Percent of Benford Sequences Never Converge. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT