Self-Heating and Parasitic Effects in Multi-Tier CFET Design

Sufia Shahin; Mahdi Benkhelifa; Yogesh Singh Chauhan; Hussam Amrouch

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.21910

Self-Heating and Parasitic Effects in Multi-Tier CFET Design

Sufia Shahin·Mahdi Benkhelifa·Yogesh Singh Chauhan·Hussam Amrouch

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this article, we study the impact of self-heating effects (SHEs) and middle of line (MOL) and back-end of line (BEOL) induced parasitics on multi-tier CFET design, where multiple nanosheet devices are vertically stacked. We analyze and compare the 4-tier CFET design with the conventional 2-tier CFET, using TCAD models calibrated to experimental measurements. Additionally, TCAD simulations are used to model and analyze SHE-induced heat distribution and temperature profiles and to extract the detailed parasitic RC network from 3D models of CMOS inverters designed with full MOL and BEOL interconnects. At the device level, the maximum temperature rise (TMAX) caused by SHE in nFET and pFET devices of the 2-tier CFET architecture is 62 K and 74 K, respectively. Due to the increased distance from the substrate heat sink, the upper-tier nFET and pFET devices in the 4-tier design show higher TMAX of 83.5 K and 98.5 K and more heat trapping in the stacked layers. Furthermore, in the 4-tier CFET-based CMOS inverters, the BEOL-induced parasitic RCs are, respectively, 10 and 6.5 times higher in the top-tier than in the 2-tier CFET-based inverters. In the bottom tier, the corresponding parasitic RC elements are 6.26 and 2 times higher, respectively, than in the 2-tier inverters. Finally, compared to the 4-tier design without parasitics, the propagation delay of the top and bottom tier inverters increases by 10% and 8.2%, respectively, due to the interconnect parasitic RCs. For the conventional 2-tier inverter, the corresponding degradation of delay with parasitic RCs is 37.25%.

Explore related subjects

cs.ET

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sufia Shahin, Mahdi Benkhelifa, Yogesh Singh Chauhan, Hussam Amrouch. 2026-03-23. Self-Heating and Parasitic Effects in Multi-Tier CFET Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond HBM-on-GPU: Thermal Design Envelope for 3D Volumetric DRAM-on-GPU Integration

The scaling of GPUs for AI and HPC workloads is increasingly constrained by the capacity, bandwidth, and thermal limits of both 2.5D HBM-GPU and direct-stacked 3D HBM-on-GPU integration. This work establishes the thermal design envelope for 3D volumetric DRAM-on-GPU integration, in which vertically oriented DRAM dies and interleaved cooling cavities reshape heat flow and memory interfacing above the GPU. Using a package-level thermal model anchored to a consistent HBM-on-GPU baseline and driven by a realistic reticle-scale non-uniform GPU power map, we quantify the key parameters governing thermal feasibility. Stack height is the dominant limiter of peak temperature, while cooling-cavity conductivity shifts the feasible region, and mold insertion and stack orientation further modulate thermal behavior. A distributed memory-controller and network-on-chip tier introduces only a moderate thermal penalty. Although die-level parallelism increases bandwidth, the reduction in simulated training time saturates once execution becomes compute-bound. These results define a bounded co-design space across bandwidth, capacity, and thermal constraints for 3D volumetric DRAM-on-GPU integration.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2026

Droop-Aware Foundation Model Power Flow

This paper develops a droop-aware extension of the GridFM power systems foundation model, embedding droop gains and frequency/voltage deadband parameters as per-bus node features to enable control-aware AC power-flow analysis. Existing power-flow datasets encode only static electrical features, conflating operating points from qualitatively different control regimes; this work resolves that gap by exposing droop and deadband parameters as structured node features, with deadband discontinuities handled through a smooth tanh approximation that preserves solver differentiability. A transformer-based graph neural network is pre-trained on masked reconstruction and fine-tuned on the resulting control-aware datasets. The framework is validated against PSCAD electromagnetic-transient simulations on a two-bus system (0.11% maximum steady-state error) and cross-validated against an independent PyPower droop solver on the IEEE 24-bus RTS. On the 24-bus system the surrogate attains R2 = 0.9996 for active generation and 0.0015 p.u. voltage-magnitude RMSE; scalability is confirmed on the IEEE 300-bus system (0.0036 p.u. RMSE, R2 = 0.9841 for voltage magnitude across 299,700 predictions). A three-mode control study further shows that the deadband widens the control-error distribution while leaving total droop compensation unchanged, establishing deadband width as an actionable node-level design feature.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2026

GNN-based Path-aware multi-view Circuit Learning for Technology Mapping

Traditional technology mapping suffers from systemic inaccuracies in delay estimation due to its reliance on abstract, technology-agnostic delay models that fail to capture the nuanced timing behavior behavior of real post-mapping circuits. To address this fundamental limitation, we introduce GPA(graph neural network (GNN)-based Path-Aware multi-view circuit learning), a novel GNN framework that learns precise, data-driven delay predictions by synergistically fusing three complementary views of circuit structure: And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs)-based functional encoding, post-mapping technology emphasizes critical timing paths. Trained exclusively on real cell delays extracted from critical paths of industrial-grade post-mapping netlists, GPA learns to classify cut delays with unprecedented accuracy, directly informing smarter mapping decisions. Evaluated on the 19 EPFL combinational benchmarks, GPA achieves 19.9%, 2.1% and 4.1% average delay reduction over the conventional heuristics methods (techmap, MCH) and the prior state-of-the-art ML-based approach SLAP, respectively-without compromising area efficiency.

cs.ET↗