Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.22308

Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers

Todor D. Todorov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We show that the field of complex numbers $\mathbb C$ contains non-zero infinitesimals by observing that $\mathbb C$ contains non-Archimedean subfields. Our observation is based on an old theorem in algebra due to E. Steinitz, discussed in the article in detail. The presence of infinitesimals in $\mathbb C$ was surprise to the author and might be surprise to the readers as well, since $\mathbb C$ is commonly defined in terms of the field of reals $\mathbb R$, which is Archimedean. An additional intrigue arises from the fact that $\mathbb R$ was historically introduced in 19-th century (by Dedekind, Cauchy and others) exactly to make infinitesimals in Leibniz-Newton infinitesimal calculus redundant. It seems that mathematics will never get rid of infinitesimals completely - they are all around us whether we like it or not. In the last section of the article we explain how our result fits to analysis, both standard and non-standard. With examples from history of calculus as well of first-class recent achievements in analysis we try to convince the reader that presence of infinitesimals in analysis simplifies its formal language and improves its efficiency. The motivations of our research is related to an attempt to simplify the properties of particular algebras of generalized functions of Colombeau's type, shortly discussed in the text.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Todor D. Todorov. 2026-03-18. Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Stairs of Reconciliation: A Mathematical Tourist in Graz

Inside the Grazer Burg, two late-Gothic stone flights rise about distinct spindles, overlap, share several treads, and separate again. Their plan is governed not by a coaxial double helix but, to first approximation, by two intersecting circles. This elementary geometry yields a model of recurrent meeting and makes explicit the compatibility conditions that meeting requires. It also leads to a second object that geometers call a double spiral staircase - the helicoid - and to a useful distinction between resemblance and identity. The staircase becomes a meditation on how paths, models, and disciplines can meet without becoming the same.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria

Starting from a Hilbert plane and removing the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence axiom, we investigate to what extent SAS can be recovered synthetically from the remaining classical triangle congruence criteria. We show that the Angle-Side-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle corresponding to Theorem 13 of Hilbert's \emph{Grundlagen der Geometrie}, suffices to reconstruct SAS. We further show that both the Side-Side-Side and the Side-Angle-Angle criteria also suffice, once combined with the ray correspondence principle and suitable auxiliary principles -- the existence of midpoints and a hypotenuse-angle criterion for right triangles in the first case, and the existence of angle bisectors, the congruence of supplements of congruent angles, and the Pons Asinorum in the second. Although the two routes rely on auxiliary principles of different character, we show that they converge on a single final argument once a common hypotenuse-angle criterion is established. A metamathematical analysis, based on an explicit model adapted from Hilbert's own independence construction, complements these reconstructions: it shows that the ray correspondence principle alone cannot reconstruct any of the classical criteria, and that the Pons Asinorum and the hypotenuse-angle criterion are each independent of the remaining auxiliary principles used in their respective reconstructions. The resulting picture is not a formal hierarchy of the congruence criteria, but it does show that the Angle-Side-Angle reconstruction rests on a provably more economical basis than those obtained from Side-Side-Side or Side-Angle-Angle.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO↗