Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.22579

The strength of Ramsey's theorem for $α$-large sets

Abstract

We calibrate the reverse mathematical strength of a family of extensions of Ramsey's theorem to finite colorings of certain subsets of the natural numbers of unbounded finite dimension. Specifically, we analyze the principles $\mathsf{RT}^{!α}_k$ asserting that every $k$-coloring of the exactly $α$-large subsets of an infinite $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ admits an infinite homogeneous set, where $α$-largeness is defined via systems of fundamental sequences in the style of Ketonen and Solovay. For each countable ordinal $α< Γ_0$ and each $k \geq 2$, we prove over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$ that the hierarchy of theorems $\mathsf{RT}^{!\a}_k$ corresponds exactly to the hierarchy of systems axiomatized by closure under transfinite Turing jumps, yielding a fine-grained classification between $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ and $\mathsf{ATR}_0$. Our results extend previous work on the case $α=ω$ and provide a uniform correspondence between countable indecomposable ordinals below $Γ_0$ and natural Ramsey-like theorems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lorenzo Carlucci, Andrea Volpi, Konrad Zdanowski. 2026-03-25. The strength of Ramsey's theorem for $α$-large sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22579

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO