Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.23334

Counting points in thin sets: A survey

Abstract

In the 1980's Serre asked how many points of bounded height can lie in a thin set. This has motivated significant research ever since, culminating in a series of recent breakthroughs. It is a good time to take stock of the central questions that have been resolved, and also to highlight remaining open questions. First, we survey recent progress on counting points of bounded height in the four types of thin sets, according to the projective/affine and type I/type II designations. Second, we turn to questions of uniformity. Famously, in the setting of type I thin sets, the best-known upper bound for the number of points of bounded height is independent of the maximum size, say $\|F\|$, of the coefficients of the polynomials that define the thin set; such an upper bound is called uniform. A uniform upper bound in the setting of type II thin sets is not known. For type II thin sets, we explore the dependence on $\|F\|$ via several strategies, and construct counterexamples that suggest the question of uniformity is quite subtle in the setting of type II thin sets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dante Bonolis, Lillian B. Pierce, Katharine Woo. 2026-03-24. Counting points in thin sets: A survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT