Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.23879

Foata, Hikita, and the Bulldozer Problem

Timothy Y. Chow
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a remarkable paper, Tatsuyuki Hikita settled a longstanding e-positivity conjecture of Stanley and Stembridge. Among many other things, he wrote down a certain formula $φ_k$, and proved that the $φ_k$ sum to one, thereby defining a probability distribution. Though Hikita's proof was simple, it remains surprising that the $φ_k$ sum to one. In this note, we give a combinatorial interpretation of Hikita's probability distribution. The main tool is a certain permutation statistic that we call the watershed. After seeing an early version of our work, Darij Grinberg noticed that the permutation statistic was implicit in a so-called "bulldozer problem" that was on the short list for the 2015 International Mathematics Olympiad. However, our description of the statistic, which makes use of the Renyi-Foata bijection, appears to be new.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Timothy Y. Chow. 2026-04-10. Foata, Hikita, and the Bulldozer Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23879

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗