Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.23913

A cube dismantling problem related to bootstrap percolation

Abstract

An $n\times n\times\dots\times n$ hypercube is made from $n^d$ unit hypercubes. Two unit hypercubes are neighbours if they share a $(d-1)$-dimensional face. In each step of a dismantling process, we remove a unit hypercube that has precisely $d$ neighbours. A move is balanced if the neighbours are in $d$ orthogonal directions. In the extremal case, there are $n^{d-1}$ independent unit hypercubes left at the end of the dismantling. We call this set of hypercubes a solution. If a solution is projected in $d$ orthogonal directions and we get the entire $[n]^{d-1}$ hypercube in each direction, then the solution is perfect. We show that it is possible to use a greedy algorithm to test whether a set of hypercubes forms a solution. Perfect solutions turn out to be precisely those which can be reached using only balanced moves. Every perfect solution corresponds naturally to a Latin hypercube. However, we show that almost all Latin hypercubes do not correspond to solutions. In three dimensions, we find at least $n$ perfect solutions for every $n$, and we use our greedy algorithm to count the perfect solutions for $n\le6$. We also construct an infinite family of imperfect solutions and show that the total size of its three orthogonal projections is asymptotic to the minimum possible value. Our results solve several conjectures posed in a proceedings paper by Barát, Korondi and Varga. If our dismantling process is reversed we get a build-up process very closely related to well-studied models of bootstrap percolation. We show that in an important special case our build-up reaches the same maximal position as bootstrap percolation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

János Barát, Ian M. Wanless. 2026-03-25. A cube dismantling problem related to bootstrap percolation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23913

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO