Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.02055

True to Tone? Quantifying Skin Tone Fidelity and Bias in Photographic-to-Virtual Human Pipelines

Gabriel Ferri Schneider·Erick Menezes·Rafael Mecenas·Paulo Knob·Victor Araujo·Soraia Raupp Musse
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Accurate reproduction of facial skin tone is essential for realism, identity preservation, and fairness in Virtual Human (VH) rendering. However, most accessible avatar creation pipelines rely on photographic inputs that lack colorimetric calibration, which can introduce inconsistencies and bias. We propose a fully automatic and scalable methodology to systematically evaluate skin tone fidelity across the VH generation pipeline. Our approach defines a full workflow that integrates skin color and illumination extraction, texture recolorization, real-time rendering, and quantitative color analysis. Using facial images from the Chicago Face Database (CFD), we compare skin tone extraction strategies based on cheek-region sampling, following the literature, and multidimensional masking derived from full-face analysis. Additionally, we test both strategies with lighting isolation, using the pre-trained TRUST framework, employed without any training or optimization within our pipeline. Extracted skin tones are applied to MetaHuman textures and rendered under multiple lighting configurations. Skin tone consistency is evaluated objectively in the CIELAB color space using the $ΔE$ metric and the Individual Typology Angle (ITA). The proposed methodology operates without manual intervention and, with the exception of pre-trained illumination compensation modules, the pipeline does not include learning or training stages, enabling low computational cost and large-scale evaluation. Using this framework, we generate and analyze approximately 19,848 rendered instances. Our results show phenotype-dependent behavior of extraction strategies and consistently higher colorimetric errors for darker skin tones.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gabriel Ferri Schneider, Erick Menezes, Rafael Mecenas, Paulo Knob, Victor Araujo, Soraia Raupp Musse. 2026-04-02. True to Tone? Quantifying Skin Tone Fidelity and Bias in Photographic-to-Virtual Human Pipelines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗