Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.03561

From UI to Code: Mobile Ads Detection via LLM-Unified Static-Dynamic Analysis

Abstract

Mobile advertisements (ads) are essential to the app economy, yet detecting them is challenging because ad content is dynamically fetched from remote servers and rendered through diverse user interfaces (UIs), making ads difficult to locate and trigger at runtime. To address this challenge, we present ADWISE, a novel framework that formulates mobile ads detection as LLM-guided, ad-oriented UI exploration. ADWISE first performs static program analysis to identify UI widgets used to place ads, which we call ad widgets. It then uses a grounded LLM reasoning loop to navigate toward and trigger these widgets under three complementary domain guidance signals: (1) WTG-based guidance, which provides global transition priors from a statically constructed window transition graph (WTG); (2) semantic guidance, which reasons over app functionality to prioritize user-likely interaction paths; and (3) structural guidance, which applies retrieval-augmented generation to match the current UI against recurring ad-heavy layouts from a knowledge base. By combining static program analysis with LLM-based reasoning over UI structure, app semantics, and retrieved analogies, ADWISE enables more effective ads detection in complex mobile UIs. Experiments on 100 benchmark apps show that ADWISE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 25.60% in ad widget detection. In addition, ADWISE uncovers 34.34% more ad regulation violations across six categories, directly benefiting downstream ad regulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shang Ma, Wei Cheng, Yanfang Ye, Xusheng Xiao. 2026-04-04. From UI to Code: Mobile Ads Detection via LLM-Unified Static-Dynamic Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Combining Type Inference and Automated Unit Test Generation for Python

Automated unit test generation is an established research field that has so far focused on statically-typed programming languages. The lack of type information in dynamically-typed programming languages, such as Python, inhibits test generators, which heavily rely on information about parameter and return types of functions to select suitable arguments when constructing test cases. Since automated test generators inherently rely on frequent execution of candidate tests, we make use of these frequent executions to address this problem by introducing type tracing, which extracts type-related information during execution and gradually refines the available type information. We implement type tracing as an extension of the Pynguin test-generation framework for Python, allowing it (i) to infer parameter types by observing how parameters are used during runtime, (ii) to record the types of values that function calls return, and (iii) to use this type information to increase code coverage. The approach leads to up to 87.8 % more branch coverage, improved mutation scores, and to type information of similar quality to that produced by other state-of-the-art type-inference tools.

cs.SE

MigrateLib: a tool for end-to-end Python library migration

Library migration is the process of replacing a library with a similar one in a software project. Manual library migration is time consuming and error prone, as it requires developers to understand the Application Programming Interfaces (API) of both libraries, map equivalent APIs, and perform the necessary code transformations. Due to the difficulty of the library migration process, most of the existing automated techniques and tooling stop at the API mapping stage or support a limited set of libraries and code transformations. In this paper, we develop an end-to-end solution that can automatically migrate code between any arbitrary pair of Python libraries that provide similar functionality. Due to the promising capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in code generation and transformation, we use LLMs as the primary engine for migration. Before building the tool, we first study the capabilities of LLMs for library migration on a benchmark of 321 real-world library migrations. We find that LLMs can effectively perform library migration, but some post-processing steps can further improve the performance. Based on this, we develop MigrateLib, a command line application that combines the power of LLMs, static analysis, and dynamic analysis to provide accurate library migration. We evaluate MigrateLib on 717 real-world Python applications that are not from our benchmark. We find that MigrateLib can migrate 32% of the migrations with complete correctness. Of the remaining migrations, only 14% of the migration-related changes are left for developers to fix for more than half of the projects.

cs.SE

Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation

Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong performance in autonomous code generation under loose specifications. However, production-grade software requires strict adherence to structural constraints, such as architectural patterns, databases, and object-relational mappings. Existing benchmarks often overlook these non-functional requirements, rewarding functionally correct but structurally arbitrary solutions. We present a systematic study evaluating how well agents handle structural constraints in multi-file backend generation. By fixing a unified API contract across 80 greenfield generation tasks and 20 feature-implementation tasks spanning eight web frameworks, we isolate the effect of structural complexity using a dual evaluation with end-to-end behavioral tests and static verifiers. Our findings reveal a phenomenon of constraint decay: as structural requirements accumulate, agent performance exhibits a substantial decline. Evaluated configurations lose 27.28 points on average in assertion pass rates from baseline to fully specified tasks. Framework sensitivity analysis exposes performance disparities: mid-tier models succeed in minimal, explicit frameworks (e.g., Flask) but perform substantially worse on average in convention-heavy environments (e.g., FastAPI, Django). Finally, error analysis identifies data-layer defects (e.g., incorrect query composition and ORM runtime violations) as the leading root causes. This work highlights that jointly satisfying functional and structural requirements remains a key open challenge for coding agents.

cs.SE