Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.04656

Subset Balancing and Generalized Subset Sum via Lattices

Abstract

We study the Subset Balancing problem: given $x \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ and a coefficient set $C \subseteq \mathbb{Z}$, find a nonzero vector $c \in C^n$ such that $c\cdot x = 0$. The standard meet-in-the-middle algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(|C|^{n/2})$, and recent improvements (SODA 2022, Chen, Jin, Randolph, and Servedio; STOC 2026, Randolph and W\k{e}grzycki) beyond this barrier apply mainly when $d$ is constant. We give a reduction from Subset Balancing with $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ to a single instance of SVP$_{\infty}$ in dimension $n+1$. Instantiating this reduction with the best known $\ell_\infty$-SVP algorithms yields a deterministic $\tilde{O}((6\sqrt{2\pi e})^n)$-time algorithm and a randomized $\tilde{O}(2^{2.443n})$-time algorithm. The exponent depends only on $n$, improving on meet-in-the-middle for all $d\ge 15$. For sufficiently large $d$ we also obtain a polynomial-time algorithm. The reduction extends from the box constraint $[-d,d]^n$ to any centrally symmetric convex body $K\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$, giving deterministic time $\tilde{O}(2^{c_K n})$ for a constant $c_K$ depending only on the shape of $K$. We further study the Generalized Subset Sum problem of finding $c \in C^n$ such that $c \cdot x = \tau$. For $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ or $C = \{-d,\dots,d\}\setminus\{0\}$, we reduce the worst-case problem to CVP$_{\infty}$ in dimension $n+1$. We observe that distances in our lattice take only integer values, so an approximate CVP$_{\infty}$ oracle still suffices, yielding a deterministic worst-case algorithm running in time $2^{O(n\log\log d)}$. In the average-case setting, we demonstrate that for both coefficient sets the embedded CVP$_{\infty}$ instance satisfies a bounded-distance promise with high probability, removing the $\log\log d$ factor altogether and obtaining a deterministic algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}((18\sqrt{2\pi e})^n)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yiming Gao, Yansong Feng, Honggang Hu, Yanbin Pan. 2026-04-06. Subset Balancing and Generalized Subset Sum via Lattices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04656

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS