Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.11760

Effects of interviewers on response to income and wealth items

Abstract

Item nonresponse to financial questions is a persistent source of survey error, especially in interviewer-administered surveys. We examine whether interviewers' expectations about respondents' willingness to report income are associated with actual item responses to income and asset questions in Wave 6 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Using data from 41,934 respondents in 12 countries, linked to interviewer survey and roster information, we analyze responses to four financial items with substantial nonresponse. We compare three approaches to handling missing covariates: complete-case analysis, multiple imputation (fill-in methods), and a generalized missing-indicator framework with information-criterion-based model averaging. Across most specifications, respondents interviewed by interviewers with higher expected income response rates are more likely to provide financial information. However, model averaging does not yield clear gains over simpler approaches. The results suggest that interviewer expectations contain useful information for understanding and modeling item nonresponse to sensitive financial items, with potential implications for interviewer training and survey fieldwork design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moslem Rashidi. 2026-04-13. Effects of interviewers on response to income and wealth items. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11760

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN