Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.23825

Recursive Record Filtering and Longest Decreasing Subsequences

Abstract

We consider a recursive record-filtering procedure, which we informally call Disappear-Sort, acting as a sort of parallel to traditional patience sorting. Let $D_n$ denote the number of passes required to eliminate a sequence of length $n$ sampled as i.i.d.\ copies of a continuous random variable, where each pass retains the left-to-right records and applies the same rule recursively to the remaining entries. For the non-resampling procedure, we associate to a permutation $p_n\in S_n$ a natural poset and show that the recursive Disappear-Sort layers form an antichain decomposition of this poset. This provides an order-theoretic interpretation of the procedure and identifies the total number of passes with $L(p_n)$, the length of the longest decreasing subsequence of $p_n$. Equivalently, after reversing the comparison direction, the Disappear-Sort layers coincide with the piles arising in classical patience sorting. For a uniformly random permutation, the pass count therefore has the same distribution as the first-column length of the tableau shape produced by the Robinson--Schensted correspondence. We use this classical connection to express $\mathbb{E}[D_n]$ as a sum over partitions and standard Young tableaux. Established results on Plancherel-random Young diagrams then imply $\mathbb{E}[D_n]\sim 2\sqrt{n}$, with fluctuations on the $n^{1/6}$ scale governed by the Tracy--Widom distribution. We also consider a resampling variant in which the nonrecord entries are replaced after each pass by a fresh independent sample of the same size, and derive an exact recurrence for its expected number of passes involving the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind. We conclude with an $O(n\log n)$ implementation for computing the non-resampling pass count.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jackson Zariski, Kaitlin Kratter. 2026-07-26. Recursive Record Filtering and Longest Decreasing Subsequences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23825

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO