Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.24294

AI-Native Autonomous Infrastructure (ANAI): A Formal Framework for the Next General-Purpose Technology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly described as a candidate next generation general purpose technology (GPT). However, existing interpretations predominantly emphasize performance scaling rather than structural transformation. This paper introduces a formal framework for evaluating AI as a systemic infrastructural transition rather than merely a computational breakthrough. We propose the concept of AI Native Autonomous Infrastructure (ANAI), defined as a regime in which decision autonomy becomes embedded within critical infrastructures. The framework operationalizes this transition through three quantitative constructs: the Autonomy Index (AIx), the Infrastructure Coupling Coefficient (ICC), and the Technological Transition Potential (TTP). We formalize the joint scaling dynamics of autonomy and infrastructural embedding, derive threshold conditions for paradigm transition, and introduce a phase-space representation of systemic transformation. A temporal transition model further illustrates how nonlinear coevolution between autonomy and infrastructure integration produces super linear growth in transition potential. Unlike prior GPT cycles, the ANAI regime exhibits a recursive energy computation feedback loop in which AI systems both increase computational demand and optimize the infrastructures that sustain them. This feedback mechanism accelerates infrastructural embedding and differentiates AI driven transformation from previous technological revolutions. By shifting analytical focus from model performance to infrastructural autonomy and coupling intensity, this study offers a conceptual and mathematical foundation for assessing whether artificial intelligence constitutes the next general purpose technology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hidir Selcuk Nogay. 2026-04-27. AI-Native Autonomous Infrastructure (ANAI): A Formal Framework for the Next General-Purpose Technology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24294

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Co-Investment with Payoff-Sharing Mechanism for Cooperative Decision-Making in Network Design Games

Network-based systems are inherently interconnected, with the design and performance of subnetworks being interdependent. However, the decisions of self-interested operators may lead to suboptimal outcomes for users and the overall system. This paper explores cooperative mechanisms that can simultaneously benefit both operators and users. We address this challenge using a game-theoretical framework that integrates both non-cooperative and cooperative game theory. In the non-cooperative stage, we propose a network design game in which subnetwork decision-makers strategically design local infrastructures. In the cooperative stage, co-investment with payoff-sharing mechanism is developed to enlarge collective benefits and fairly distribute them. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct case studies on the Sioux Falls network and real-world public transport networks in Zurich and Winterthur, Switzerland. Our evaluation considers impacts on environmental sustainability, social welfare, and economic efficiency. The proposed framework provides a foundation for improving interdependent networked systems by enabling strategic cooperation among self-interested operators.

eess.SY

Generalizable Optimal Control with Transformers: One Policy Across Diverse Systems

Classical optimal control designs a separate controller for each plant. Even for the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), every new model must be identified and its Riccati equation re-solved. We ask whether a single learned policy can instead serve an entire family of systems, and we show that one transformer can. We train the policy to imitate optimal LQR state feedback across a collection of heterogeneous Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output (MIMO) Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) systems that differ in their state and input dimensions and in their cost objectives. A shared representation lets the same parameters control every member of the family. It combines system-wise standardization, zero-padding and masking across dimensions, and an explicit encoding of the cost matrices. At run time, the policy maps a short window of recent states and the specified cost to a control action. It uses no plant matrices and identifies the dynamics implicitly from the state history. We evaluate on $28$ simulated systems over $9{,}675$ closed-loop rollouts, and no unstable rollout was observed in any of them. On the systems seen during training, it attains a median relative sub-optimality of $0.022\%$, even under parameter perturbations of up to $\pm10\%$. It transfers to unseen systems with lightweight fine-tuning, reaching a median sub-optimality of $0.19\%$. These results support transformers as generalizable near-optimal controllers for structured families of linear systems.

eess.SY

Two-Timescale Asymptotic Simulations of Hybrid Inclusions with Applications to Stochastic Hybrid Optimization

Convergence properties of model-free two-timescale asymptotic simulations of singularly perturbed hybrid inclusions are developed. A hybrid inclusion combines constrained differential and difference inclusions to capture continuous (flow) and discrete (jump) dynamics, respectively. Sufficient conditions are established under which sequences of iterates and step sizes constitute a two-timescale asymptotic simulation of such a system, with limiting behavior characterized via weakly invariant and internally chain-transitive sets of an associated boundary layer and reduced system. To illustrate the applicability of these results, conditions are given under which a two-timescale stochastic approximation of a hybrid optimization algorithm asymptotically recovers the behavior of its deterministic counterpart.

eess.SY