Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.24486

Comparative Evaluation of Modern Deep Learning Methodologies for Portfolio Optimization

Abstract

This study proposes a portfolio optimization framework that integrates advanced deep learning architectures with traditional financial models to enhance risk-adjusted performance. Using historical data from 2015-2023 across equities, ETFs, and bonds, the research evaluates the predictive power of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), Transformers, and Autoencoders. The models jointly address covariance estimation, return forecasting, dynamic asset allocation, and dimensionality reduction. Hybrid approaches such as Transformer+GNN and Autoencoder+DRL are also explored to capture both relational and temporal market structures. Performance is assessed through backtesting using metrics including volatility, cumulative return, maximum drawdown, annualized return, and Sharpe ratio across seven strategies, including Equal-Weighted, 60/40 allocation, and Mean-Variance Optimization (MVO). Results show that hybrid models provide superior stability and risk control, with Transformer+GNN achieving the lowest volatility and drawdown. MVO, when paired with well-calibrated inputs, delivers the highest cumulative return and Sharpe ratio, highlighting the continued relevance of traditional methods. Standalone DRL underperforms due to limited structural awareness, while Autoencoders exhibit behavior similar to Equal-Weight strategies, emphasizing the need for dynamic policy learning. These findings align with existing literature on relational modeling and feature compression in finance. Overall, the study demonstrates that combining deep learning with financial theory yields robust and adaptive portfolio strategies and suggests exploring latent representations within traditional optimization frameworks to improve scalability and performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Samuel Ozechi, Banjo Francis, Wisdom Yakanu, Joe Wayne Byers. 2026-04-27. Comparative Evaluation of Modern Deep Learning Methodologies for Portfolio Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24486

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cosm: Collective switched motion for sparse Ising optimization

We introduce Collective Switched Motion (Cosm), a heuristic optimization framework based on switched collective dynamics. Cosm compiles the objective into subobjectives that are activated sequentially, temporally separating competing local influences. The interplay of switching and local interactions among variables gives rise to collective search behavior, while a new correlated perturbation mechanism encourages coordinated cluster motion. Tests on tuned-hardness spin-glass benchmarks suggest more favorable algorithmic scaling than that reported for leading dynamical solvers. Cosm heuristically attains the certified optima of three of the largest Gset instances (G72, G77, G81), exceeding the previously reported heuristic solutions. On the large random-graph instances G61 and G70, a CPU implementation reliably attains the best-known solutions, reaching cuts of 5799 and 9595 with 99%-confidence times-to-target of 15 s and 2.4 s, respectively. On the heterogeneous-degree G64 instance, Cosm establishes a new best-known cut of 8753. Broadly, the results suggest an alternative approach to heuristic design in which local dynamics and orchestration mechanisms are carefully designed so that effective search emerges.

cs.CE

Decomposing Firm-Level Crisis Responses from Incomplete Market Signals: Evidence from China's IT Sector During COVID-19

Exogenous shocks generate heterogeneous behavioral responses across firms, yet event studies typically report only sector-level averages. This paper develops a multi-method approach combining causal identification (difference-in-differences with cluster-robust inference), unsupervised behavioral discovery (K-means trajectory clustering, Gaussian hidden Markov models), and cross-sectional resilience prediction (logistic regression with nested cross-validation) to decompose firm-level response heterogeneity from noisy market signals. We demonstrate the approach on 246 Chinese A-share IT firms (216 with complete data for all analyses) during the COVID-19 shock (January 2020), using 252 non-IT CSI 300 firms as controls. The return decline was market-wide, not IT-specific (DID p = 0.59); the IT-specific effect was elevated volatility (DID beta = 0.043, cluster-robust p < 0.001), with the effect surviving Benjamini-Hochberg correction in 13 of 30 alternative specifications. Unsupervised clustering produced three trajectory groups: fast recovery (36 companies, +29.7%), resilient/moderate (67 companies), and persistent drag (113 companies, -6.9%). Pre-crisis financial fundamentals showed only modest predictive power for resilience (nested CV AUC = 0.635, 95% CI: 0.558-0.711; permutation p = 0.016), consistent with the limited informativeness of publicly available signals for anticipating crisis outcomes. The combination of causal analysis, unsupervised learning, and prediction represents a reproducible framework which can be applied to crises in other market periods.

cs.CE

An Insurance Broker for Every Small Business: The Economics of Exceptional Care at Scale

Small-business owners need expert guidance on their own terms, across schedules, languages, and channels, but low premiums make exceptional, continuous human service uneconomic for much of the market. Combining public evidence, Kinro operational data, and an illustrative five-year service model, we show why traditional brokerage economics leave 35 million U.S. small businesses underserved. An AI-native brokerage can change those economics by performing and coordinating routine work continuously, while licensed professionals govern consequential exceptions and the brokerage remains accountable.

cs.CE