Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2604.24614

The Genetic and Environmental Architecture of the Human Functional Connectome

Abstract

Functional connectivity varies across individuals due to genetic and environmental factors, yet classical twin models typically confound non-shared environment with measurement error and are largely limited to resting-state analyses. We hypothesized that: i) explicitly modeling measurement error from repeated fMRI sessions enables more accurate application of classical twin models (ACE/ADE) to functional connectivity; ii) model applicability depends on scan-length and parcellation granularity; iii) genetic and environmental effects on functional connectomes show differentiated functional modules across conditions. We extended ACE/ADE models to include a repeated-scan derived error term by analyzing monozygotic and dizygotic twins from the Young-Adult Human Connectome Project dataset. Genetic and environment variance components were estimated for all functional couplings across resting-state and task conditions, integrated across conditions using a minimum-error criterion, and analyzed using multilayer community detection across resolution scales. Functional couplings segregated into distinct categories characterized by shared environmental, additive, dominant, or epistatic influences, with a substantial fraction not meeting twin-model assumptions. Integrating across conditions revealed hierarchical community structure in genetic and environmental components observed across community resolution scales. Incorporating measurement error into twin models improves interpretability and applicability at the functional connectome level, revealing that genetic and environmental influences are structured into coherent, multiscale brain networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tanu Raghav, Daniel Guerrero, Uttara Tipnis, Julie Sara Benny, Mintao Liu, Mario Dzemidzic, Arian Ashourvan, Alex P. Miller, Beau Ances, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Joaquín Goñi. 2026-04-27. The Genetic and Environmental Architecture of the Human Functional Connectome. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24614

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Binding-Motivated Contextuality: A Cross-Domain Cyclic Test in Perception and Judgment

Perceptual binding and the contextuality of judgment are studied apart, in psychophysics and decision research. We argue they share one obstruction: a nonzero class in $H^1$ of a presheaf with no global section -- though only contextuality is tested, since binding's obstruction vanishes. We build on sheaf formulations of predictive coding (Seely 2025) and contextuality (Abramsky & Brandenburger 2011): a cyclic set of pairwise judgments admits a global (noncontextual) explanation exactly when the cyclic (Suppes-Zanotti / n-cycle) inequalities hold. Its obstruction is measured by the complete contextual fraction CF (Abramsky, Barbosa & Mansfield 2017), not the weaker Cech invariant, which certifies contextuality but can miss it (Caru 2017). Penrose (1992) classifies the continuous tribar by $H^1$ over the multiplicative group $\mathbb{R}^+$ of depths -- but the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ case is what we test. We build the perceptual arena from two binary judgments per cyclic-dominance pairing, realizing the same frustrated-cycle obstruction as the survey. The central test is cross-domain: one cohort performs both; shared mechanism predicts a correlation between the arenas' signed obstruction margins -- CF before clamping -- which neither field has measured. Both are inconsistency scores, so a bare correlation is confounded by general response consistency. The prediction is therefore confound-residualized: the correlation must survive partialling out a general-consistency factor from a variance- and reliability-matched control. A sufficiently precise null would count against that account, provided the preregistered reliability checks pass and the control does not load on the obstruction. All three tests are designed but unrun.

q-bio.NC

Personal Danger Signals Reprocessing: New Online Group Intervention for Chronic Pain

Background. Chronic pain affects roughly one in five adults, much of it chronic primary, or nociplastic, pain. Psychological therapy reaches few who need it, and remote programmes produce small, poorly maintained effects. Personal Danger Signals Reprocessing (PDSR) is an eight-week coached online group intervention built on predictive processing, acting at once on the danger prior, on the actions that confirm it, and on the precision assigned to bodily signals. Methods. Of 47 individuals screened with chronic non-cancerous, non-neuropathic pain, 39 women were randomized to PDSR (n = 19) or a waiting list (n = 20). Outcomes were collected at baseline, week 4 and week 8, and pain intensity again at six months in both arms, and analysed with linear mixed-effects models. Results. At week 8 the PDSR group reported lower pain intensity than the waiting list (d= -1.43, 95% CI [-2.10, -0.77]), lower pain interference (d= -1.78 [-2.45, -1.10]) and higher well-being (d = 1.55 [0.89, 2.22]), all p < .001. Catastrophizing , anxiety and insomnia were also lower at week 8; for depression the time-by-group interaction was not significant (p = .151). Fifteen of 19 PDSR participants (79%) achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain and 12 (63%) at least 50%, against 7 (35%) and 3 (15%) on the waiting list. The within-arm gain held at six months: more then 50% of the PDSR group demonstrated complete or near-complete recovery. In an exploratory mediation, catastrophizing at week 4 carried the effect on week-8 pain (indirect effect -1.63 [-2.72, -0.72]). Conclusions. PDSR produced large reductions in pain, interference and psychological comorbidity relative to a waiting list. The trial is small, single-sex, unblinded and waiting-list controlled, so expectancy cannot be separated from the proposed mechanism; an active-controlled trial is the next step.

q-bio.NC

Chaotic Dynamics-Regulated Topological Learning for Patient-Specific Preictal State Identification

Epileptic seizures arise from complex, nonlinear interactions within brain networks, yet reliable electroencephalographic (EEG) prediction remains challenging due to the nonstationary and heterogeneous nature of neural dynamics. Existing methods typically analyze EEG data as static or weakly time-dependent snapshots, overlooking the intrinsic dynamics and lacking the geometric sensitivity to capture the hierarchical, localized evolution of the epileptogenic zone. To address these limitations, we propose an offline, patient-specific evaluation of chaotic dynamics-regulated topological learning (CDRTL) for distinguishing preictal from interictal EEG states. This framework unifies chaotic dynamics, multiscale algebraic topology, and local network differentiation. Specifically, we partition EEG signals into discrete functional subnets based on correlation strengths, capturing the multi-scale connectivity of the brain. By modeling each node as a Lorenz oscillator, we embed the underlying chaotic dynamics into the network architecture. We then apply the persistent Laplacian to simultaneously extract topological invariants and geometric shape evolution through harmonic and non-harmonic spectral analysis. Additionally, a node-removal topological differentiation strategy isolates localized neural contributions. Our framework was evaluated on the CHB-MIT database using balanced preictal and interictal labels and stratified channel-level cross-validation within each patient. The results support offline discrimination of preictal and interictal channel-level nodes within fixed patient-specific networks. Because representations are constructed from the complete network, including held-out unlabeled nodes, before cross-validation, the reported performance is specific to this transductive setting and does not establish generalization to unseen EEG windows, seizures, or patients.

q-bio.NC