Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.00001

The Fourth Geometry II: From Angle Axioms to Metric Foundations

Abstract

This paper is a sequel to arXiv:2511.01024 (Base 1), where an axiomatic framework for angles and the foundations of difference-angle geometry were introduced. In difference-angle geometry, where the difference of slopes of lines is treated as a primary angular quantity (the difference angle), we reconstruct the focal structure of parabolas from a difference-angle-theoretic viewpoint and develop the associated algebraic and analytic structures. First, we introduce the difference-angle focal function and define the focus of a parabola constructively as its zero set. This approach yields a formulation of the parabolic power that differs from that presented in Base 1. Next, by interpreting the power as a classical representation of an inner product, we derive a difference-angle version of the parallelogram theorem via a polarization identity, and thereby define the difference-angle inner product as a pseudo-inner product. The robustness of this structure is substantiated by deriving a difference-angle version of Stewart's theorem based solely on computations involving the difference-angle inner product. Furthermore, we define the parabolic trigonometric functions cosp(theta) and sinp(theta) (together with related functions) associated with a difference angle (theta), and show that they satisfy identities corresponding to the first and second cosine laws in Euclidean geometry. Finally, we reexamine the Cayley-Klein angle and distance derived from Laguerre's formula, and in particular verify that the existing Cayley-Klein angle satisfies the axiomatic system for angles introduced in Base 1. We then show that, in the parabolic limit of the absolute conic, the difference angle and the difference-angle norm arise naturally as the linear degeneration of the logarithmic cross ratio.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Masanori Nakazato. 2026-01-20. The Fourth Geometry II: From Angle Axioms to Metric Foundations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. Liu proposed the conjecture \[ \sum_{\text{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \ge 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,\qquad k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $k<1$. We prove this conjecture by reducing it to an algebraic inequality for three positive variables with prescribed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM

A quadratic critical-value conjecture for the fifth Bessel moment

We conjecture an explicit evaluation of the pure fifth Bessel moment $\int_0^\infty K_0(t)^5\,dt$ as a quadratic expression in the critical value $L(f,2)$ of the weight-three, level-60 newform $f$ (LMFDB orbit 60.3.b.a) identified in the twisted fifth-moment modularity theorem of Lim, Tu and Yu, with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ and the square taken before the real and imaginary parts. Directed interval computations, using no stored Bessel or $L$-values, bound the absolute discrepancy by $10^{-358}$. We prove three exact modular identities for $f$: the Petersson-norm formula $\langle f,f\rangle_{60} = \frac{3(5-\sqrt{5})}{2π^4}|L(f,2)|^2$, the coefficient-conjugation relation $L(f^σ,2) = κL(f,2)$ with explicit $κ\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5},i)$, and the twisted symmetric-square evaluation $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2) = \sqrt{15}\,π^2 \langle f,f\rangle_{60}$, together with $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,3) = π^4\langle f,f\rangle_{60}/8$, in the full Euler-factor normalization of Lim, Tu and Yu. The last identity shows that the companion norm conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = \frac{3\sqrt{15}(5-\sqrt{5})}{2}|L(f,2)|^2$ is equivalent to the symmetric-square conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = π^2 L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2)$ of Lim, Tu and Yu, while the exact relation $D_{5,\mathrm{even}} = π^2 D_{5,\mathrm{odd}}/(2\sqrt{15})$ follows from Chuang's period formulas. Every Bessel-to-modular equality, including the individual-period formula, remains conjectural. Complete proofs, exact rational certificates and verification programs are included as ancillary files.

math.GM