Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.02680

The Rise of Negative Earnings and Demand Shifting Investment

Abstract

We document the rise of negative earnings between 1980 and 2019: a secular increase in the percent of firms reporting losses, both among public firms and in the broader universe of US corporations, and a secular increase in the persistence of losses year-to-year among public firms. This rise has occurred alongside a spreading of the sales and earnings distribution and a recomposition of firm spending away from production costs and traditional investment and towards sales general and administrative expenses. We rationalize these phenomena with a model of heterogenous firms engaging in supply and demand shifting investment. Our model includes a scale elasticity of demand determining the relationship between the intensive margin of demand (demand per customer) and the extensive margin of demand (number of customers). We are able to quantitatively match the rise in reported losses and qualitatively match (1) the increased persistence of losses, (2) the spreading of the sales and earning distribution and (3) the recomposition of firm spending with this parameter as the single driver of changes across steady state equilibria. The rise in the scale elasticity associated with the increase in reported losses has non-trivial aggregate implications: in our model it lowers GDP by -9.1% by reallocating labor away from goods and capital production and reallocating demand away from productive firms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jacob Toner Gosselin, Dalton Rongxuan Zhang. 2026-05-07. The Rise of Negative Earnings and Demand Shifting Investment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN