Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.06168

Scalable model selection for count time series with structural breaks: application to solid-organ transplantation during and after COVID-19 in the USA and Italy

Abstract

Weekly healthcare activity data are typically non-negative counts with temporal dependence and occasional system-wide disruptions, settings in which Gaussian time-series models may be inadequate. Solid organ transplant (SOT) activity provides a representative case study of a count process affected by a large external shock. We analyse weekly SOT counts in the USA and Italy from 2014 to October 2024, stratified by donor type (deceased vs living) and organ (kidney and liver). We fit Poisson and negative-binomial count time-series models incorporating short-term dynamics, calendar effects (holiday weeks), and pre-specified pandemic-period level and/or slope indicators. Candidate specifications are screened within a pre-defined portfolio and selected using BIC within each training window. Forecasting performance is evaluated with an expanding-window design at horizons $h\in\{4,8,12\}$ weeks. Alongside RMSE, we report empirical coverage of nominal $95\%$ predictive intervals and interval widths to summarise calibration and forecast uncertainty. Across strata, selected models capture substantial pandemic-period deviations and varying post-period trajectories. Deceased-donor series are broadly consistent with a return towards pre-pandemic baselines in both countries, whereas the US living-donor series shows a more gradual convergence in this application. Within the explored model class and validation protocol, auxiliary covariates representing COVID burden and mortality add limited incremental predictive contribution beyond autoregressive and calendar components. Our analysis shows that donation time series represent an unconditional phenomenon, with auxiliary variables having a statistically negligible impact on donations, thus allowing a focus on more practical aspects related to ongoing challenges in the post-pandemic era, such as hospital overloads and changes in public perception.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tobia Filosi, Emiliano Ceccarelli, Emilio Porcu, Elena Del Sordo, Libia Lara-Carrion, Giuseppe Iuppa, Francesca Puoti, Silvia Trapani, Silvia Testa, Giovanna Jona Lasinio. 2026-05-07. Scalable model selection for count time series with structural breaks: application to solid-organ transplantation during and after COVID-19 in the USA and Italy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06168

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Relegation, promotion and the components of scoring in water polo

Relegation, not the championship, decides the outcome of many European water polo leagues: one club has won every recent national title in Italy, Spain and Hungary. We make the relegation decision our object of inference. Serie A1 relegates one club for finishing last and a second through a three-match play-out, and we ask at each stage how much can be known and when. Promoted clubs arrive with no top-flight record, so we also compare four ways of setting their prior. These analyses rest on the first Bayesian hierarchical model of water polo, which splits scoring into even-strength, man-up and penalty components, models opportunities and conversions separately, and lets abilities evolve between seasons. Treating the components as independent proves untenable, since they compete for a common budget of possessions. Fitted to a new dataset of 940 matches, the model identifies the directly relegated club from the ninth round, before the league table does, predicts the play-out field better than the table, and shows the play-out itself to be close to a coin toss. Promoted clubs start below the league on every component except drawing exclusions: knowing a club was promoted improves forecasts; knowing how does not.

stat.AP

Geospatial Foundation Models Capture Health-Relevant Dimensions of Place Beyond Conventional Social Risk Indices

Area-based social risk indices summarize residents' socioeconomic conditions but incompletely capture physical features of place that may affect health. We evaluated whether numerical representations of physical place produced by four geospatial foundation model families from 2022 satellite data explained residual variance in tract-level associations between the Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index with health outcomes. We used LightGBM to predict variables from the American Community Survey and 40 chronic disease and health-behavior outcomes from CDC PLACES across 82,646 census tracts in the contiguous United States, evaluating performance across 10 held-out states. Among survey variables, models were moderately predictive of some variables including housing type (R-squared up to 0.54) but weak for disability, unemployment, and income disparity. For health outcomes, models explained up to 54% of variance left unexplained by social risk indices, with the largest gains for annual checkups, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Mean total variance explained by geospatial foundation models across the 40 health-related outcomes increased from 0.31 in the smallest tract-size decile to 0.39 in the largest. Geospatial foundation models capture health-relevant features of place not represented by conventional social risk indices and may usefully augment them in epidemiological analyses.

stat.AP

Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often representative of the target population but may be subject to uncontrolled confounding. We consider estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an absolute measure, by combining a representative sample of treated routine care patients with summary measures (i.e., estimated risk or hazard ratios) from either a randomised trial or a meta-analysis of trials. Under marginal or conditional transportability assumptions, the ATT is shown to be identifiable. The implications of collapsibility of the effect measure on transportability are discussed, and plug-in estimators of the ATT are presented. Simulation studies are used to assess finite sample performance of the estimators in a range of settings. The proposed methods are applied to estimate the ATT of endocrine therapy on 15-year breast cancer mortality using results from a meta-analysis of randomised trials and England's National Disease Registration Service.

stat.AP