Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.16887

Mind the Gap: Learning Modality-Agnostic Representations with a Cross-Modality UNet

Abstract

Cross-modality recognition has many important applications in science, law enforcement and entertainment. Popular methods to bridge the modality gap include reducing the distributional differences of representations of different modalities, learning indistinguishable representations or explicit modality transfer. The first two approaches suffer from the loss of discriminant information while removing the modality-specific variations. The third one heavily relies on the successful modality transfer, could face catastrophic performance drop when explicit modality transfers are not possible or difficult. To tackle this problem, we proposed a compact encoder-decoder neural module (cmUNet) to learn modality-agnostic representations while retaining identity-related information. This is achieved through cross-modality transformation and in-modality reconstruction, enhanced by an adversarial/perceptual loss which encourages indistinguishability of representations in the original sample space. For cross-modality matching, we propose MarrNet where cmUNet is connected to a standard feature extraction network which takes as inputs the modality-agnostic representations and outputs similarity scores for matching. We validated our method on five challenging tasks, namely Raman-infrared spectrum matching, cross-modality person re-identification and heterogeneous (photo-sketch, visible-near infrared and visible-thermal) face recognition, where MarrNet showed superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, it is observed that a cross-modality matching method could be biased to extract discriminant information from partial or even wrong regions, due to incompetence of dealing with modality gaps, which subsequently leads to poor generalization. We show that robustness to occlusions can be an indicator of whether a method can well bridge the modality gap.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xin Niu, Enyi Li, Jinchao Liu, Yan Wang, Margarita Osadchy, Yongchun Fang. 2026-05-16. Mind the Gap: Learning Modality-Agnostic Representations with a Cross-Modality UNet. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2023.3348656.

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV