Continuous Algebras with Hypotheses

Lukas Mulder; Damien Pous; Jana Wagemaker

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.18450

Continuous Algebras with Hypotheses

Lukas Mulder·Damien Pous·Jana Wagemaker

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the literature on Kleene algebra (KA), a number of variants have been proposed such as Kleene algebra with tests, commutative KA, bi-KA, and concurrent KA. The equational theories of some of these structures have then been studied in the presence of additional assumptions, called hypotheses. We propose a unifying framework encompassing all the previous structures, as well as regular tree languages. This is done by considering algebras ordered by complete lattices, where least fixpoints can be computed. We provide a canonical model consisting of closed languages, which we prove sound and complete with respect to all continuous models. Then we study quasi-equational axiomatisations. It is illusory to hope for a generic axiomatisation which would be sound and complete for all instances. Instead, we provide a generic axiomatisation which we prove sound and we setup tools that make it possible to get complete ones in a modular way, building on previous works from the literature. We showcase these tools by proving new completeness results for commutative KA, bi-KA, and regular tree languages, in each case extended with various hypotheses.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Lukas Mulder, Damien Pous, Jana Wagemaker. 2026-07-13. Continuous Algebras with Hypotheses. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18450

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Completeness of Kozen's Axiomatization for the Modal mu-Calculus: A Simple Proof

The modal mu-calculus, introduced by Dexter Kozen, is an extension of modal logic with fixpoint operators. Its axiomatization, Koz, was introduced at the same time and is an extension of the minimal modal logic K with the so-called Park fixpoint induction principle. It took more than a decade for the completeness of Koz to be proven, finally achieved by Igor Walukiewicz. However, his proof is fairly involved. In this article, we present an improved proof for the completeness of Koz which, although similar to the original, is simpler and easier to understand. Keywords: The modal mu-calculus, completeness, omega-automata.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Blurred Drinker Paradoxes and Blurred Choice Axioms: Constructive Reverse Mathematics of the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem

In the setting of constructive reverse mathematics, we analyse the downward Löwenheim-Skolem (DLS) theorem of first-order logic, stating that every infinite model has a countable elementary submodel. Refining the well-known equivalence of the DLS theorem to the axiom of dependent choice (DC) over classical base theories, our constructive approach allows for several finer logical decompositions: Just assuming countable choice (CC), the DLS theorem is equivalent to the conjunction of DC with a newly identified fragment of the excluded middle (LEM) that we call the blurred drinker paradox (BDP). Further without CC, the DLS theorem is equivalent to the conjunction of BDP with similarly blurred weakenings of DC and CC. Independently of their connection with the DLS theorem, we also study BDP and the blurred choice axioms on their own, for instance by showing that BDP is LEM without a contribution of Markov's principle and that blurred DC is DC without a contribution of CC. The paper is hyperlinked with an accompanying Coq development.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Algorithmic Unverifiability of Safety for Fixed and Recursively Self-Improving Systems

We establish mathematical limits of algorithmic safety verification for Turing-complete self-modifying systems, the class in which recursive self-improvement takes place, both for a fixed system and across its own modification. Statically, no verifier is sound, complete and tractable: over unbounded domains by Rice's and Gödel's theorems, over all finite configurations by Trakhtenbrot's theorem, and over succinctly described finite environments because verifying a policy against an adversary is coNP-complete and synthesising one is PSPACE-complete. Dynamically, we model one step of self-modification as a computable transformation of code and ask whether a safety property survives it. If the transformation depends only on behaviour, this is Rice's theorem one level up; if it reads the code, as self-modification does, the question is no longer semantic, yet the same s-m-n reduction works inside a class of behaviourally identical programs and inherits the halting degree. One step is never harder than the property; persistence along the whole trajectory can be $Π^0_2$-complete. Certification by a total algorithm is possible only for transformations of restricted expressivity, not merely for systems that stop changing. No tower of supervisors helps, and every total supervisor errs on an undecidable set of systems. For effectively pointwise properties, every faithful bounded scheme that certifies on finite behavioural evidence admits evolution traces certified at every stage while the property is violated. What survives is exact: a monitor that raises an alarm on violation semidecides it, and comparison against a frozen reference keeps the full theory.

cs.LO↗