Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.19513

Trace definability IV: higher arity notions

Abstract

Motivated by the "composition theorems" of Chernikov-Hempel and Abd Aldaim-Conant-Terry we introduce $k$-trace definability between first order theories. Any theory which is $k$-trace definable in a NIP theory is $k$-NIP and any theory which is $2$-trace definable in a stable theory is $2$-NFOP. All known examples of $k$-NIP theories are $k$-trace definable in NIP theories. We show that for several of the main examples of $k$-NIP theories $T$ there is a NIP theory $T^*$ such that $T$ is the (unique up to a certain notion of equivalence) universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in $T^*$. For example the theory of Hilbert space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in RCF, the theory of the generic class $k$ nilpotent Lie algebra over $\mathbb{F}_p$ is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of infinite $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector spaces, the theory of the generic $k$-hypergraph is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of a set with two elements, and the theory of Uryshon space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in the theory of $(\mathbb{R}; +, <)$. We construct the universal theory $D_k(T)$ which is $k$-trace definable in an arbitrary theory $T$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Erik Walsberg. 2026-05-19. Trace definability IV: higher arity notions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19513

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Natural Term Logic

In this paper we develop a formal system called Natural Term Logic (NTL). NTL aims to represent key aspects of the logical and grammatical mechanisms of natural language as well as grammatical transformations which preserve core logical meaning. NTL can be seen as a refinement of the ideas of Quine's paper `Variables Explained Away' and the technical concepts introduced by Bealer and Zalta. NTL is more fine-grained than Bealer's first-order intensional logic (BL): there is a many-to-one correspondence $ν$ between NTL terms and closed BL terms as well as a canonical map $β$ which assigns to each closed BL term a corresponding NTL term. The map $ν$ can be seen as assigning a core logical content of the NTL term. We define a series of reductions on NTL terms which intuitivelyy speaking capture meaning-preserving syntactic transformations ( transformations which preserved the basic logical meaning of a term) and our main result is that each NTL term $T$ reduces to a unique normal term $N$. The reductions fall into the structural, predicative and pushing-in categories. Predicative reductions decompose NTL terms so that predication is only applied to a primitive term (such terms are called prenormal). A key ingredient in the proof is the fact that $βνN = N$ when $N$ is normal. This suggests that within NTL the normal form of a term expresses the core logical content of the term.

math.LO

Hyper-hyperfiniteness and complexity

We show that if there exists a countable Borel equivalence relation which is hyper-hyperfinite but not hyperfinite, then the complexity of hyperfinite countable Borel equivalence relationsis as high as possible, namely, $Σ^1_2$-complete. We also establish an implication between the question of the effectivity of hyperfiniteness and its complexity.

math.LO

Coordinate recognition: General theory, Groups, and other surprises

A class of structures \emph{recognizes coordinates} if any reduced product of structures from said class witnesses a certain kind of rigidity phenomenon. We provide several equivalent characterizations of this property. This property has (at least) two remarkable consequences, one set-theoretic and one model-theoretic, for reduced products of structures of the said class. First, under appropriate set-theoretic assumptions every isomorphism between such reduced products associated with the Fréchet ideal lifts (modulo a finite change) to an isomorphism between products of the original structures. Second, with an additional mild assumption, it implies a strong quantifier elimination result. Of note, we show that a class recognizes coordinates if and only if an individual formula witnesses a certain syntactic property. We also consider many concrete classes of structures and determine whether or not they recognize coordinates. We place heavy emphasis on well-known classes of groups, such as permutation groups, acylindircally hyperbolic groups, quasisimple groups, free products, and graph products, but we also discuss other classes of structures.

math.LO