Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.19526

Kleitman's theorem over vector spaces: parity phenomena in canonical and global stability

Chenhui Lv·Zixiang Xu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1966, Kleitman determined the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n]$ with bounded symmetric difference. Liao, Liu and Yan recently established a vector-space analogue in the cases $n=d+1$ and $n>2d$, and asked for the sharp bound in the remaining range. We resolve this problem completely by proving the exact vector-space analogue of Kleitman's theorem for every $n\ge d+1$, and we also determine all extremal configurations. We further develop a stability theory for the vector-space diameter problem. Unlike the Boolean cube, the lattice of subspaces has no translation symmetry, and this makes the stability theory substantially different from its classical counterpart. The geometry of subspace balls leads to two natural notions: canonical stability, which forbids containment only in the canonical extremal configurations, and global stability, which forbids containment in arbitrary balls or adjacent double balls of the corresponding radius. We determine sharp canonical stability in even diameter, sharp canonical and global stability in odd diameter, and prove a nontrivial general upper bound for global stability in even diameter. In particular, these two notions exhibit a sharp parity split: in odd diameter they collapse to the same problem, whereas in even diameter they lead to genuinely different extremal behavior.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chenhui Lv, Zixiang Xu. 2026-05-19. Kleitman's theorem over vector spaces: parity phenomena in canonical and global stability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19526

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗