Quantile-Based Effectiveness Persistence Function: A Tail-Focused Metric with Theory, Estimation, and Application to Biosimilar Evaluation

Sankaran P. G.; Prasanth V. P.; Midhu N. N

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.20135

Quantile-Based Effectiveness Persistence Function: A Tail-Focused Metric with Theory, Estimation, and Application to Biosimilar Evaluation

Sankaran P. G.·Prasanth V. P.·Midhu N. N

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In clinical studies, persistence, which measures the duration of time a patient continues to take a prescribed medication without discontinuation, is increasingly recognized as a critical indicator of adherence to medication. Adherence encompasses not only whether a patient takes their medication as prescribed but also the consistency and duration with which they do so. Among the various metrics used to evaluate adherence, persistence stands out as a particularly robust measure because it provides a temporal dimension, reflecting the sustained commitment of patients to their therapeutic regimens. This focus on persistence offers unique insights into adherence-related quality and performance, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities to optimize long-term medication use. The comparison of upper-tail clinical performance, which measures the extent to which very large responses persist among top responders, is often more decisive in therapy evaluation than conventional summaries. In this paper, we introduce the quantile-based effectiveness persistence function defined as the ratio between the tail mean and the quantile function. The notion parallels expected shortfall in risk theory and is tailored to detect clinically meaningful deviations in the upper tail. We establish key properties and show that the function is equivalent to the first L-moment of the scaled tail, yielding robust inference tools. We derive a simple nonparametric estimator of the function and develop a bootstrap-calibrated two-sample (upper-tail) equivalence test. Simulation studies and real-data analysis illustrate that the proposed measures captures clinically relevant tail persistence that complements median and mean-based summaries.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sankaran P. G., Prasanth V. P., Midhu N. N. 2026-05-19. Quantile-Based Effectiveness Persistence Function: A Tail-Focused Metric with Theory, Estimation, and Application to Biosimilar Evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20135

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗