Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.29696

That Damned Equation. Rigour, Credit Attribution, and the Wheeler-DeWitt Equation 1962-1967

Abstract

The notion of rigour relevant to the practice of physics is an endogenous one. Theoretical physics has its own internal norms about mathematical practice and notions of legitimate derivations or formal objects. These norms are often implicit, local, and change in substantial ways over time. Moreover, norms of rigour in theoretical physics, at least in the mid-twentieth century, are primarily focused on the goal of removing barriers for concrete calculation and clear conceptualisation. Rather than pursuit of rigour for its own sake, or to achieve some `higher' standard of truth, theoretical physicists seek to `rigorise' initial, semi-formal constructions in order to render formally well-defined models with which they can make concrete contact with the world, through calculations of quantities of interest. In what follows we will support this thesis based upon a detailed historical case study of the development of and attribution of credit for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in the period 1962-67. Drawing upon archival material and the published record we develop and defend the explanatory hypothesis that it was the rigorisation of the equation via the expression for the inner product that was the crucial step in the work of Wheeler and DeWitt rather than the statement of the equation itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander S. Blum, Dean Rickles, Karim Thébault. 2026-05-28. That Damned Equation. Rigour, Credit Attribution, and the Wheeler-DeWitt Equation 1962-1967. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29696

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deriving Ontological Statements from the Unnatural Higgs Mass

We provide novel, metatheoretical arguments strengthening the position that the naturalness problem of the light Higgs mass is a pseudo-problem: Under one assumption, no physics beyond the standard model of particle physics is needed to explain the small value of the Higgs boson. By evaluating previous successes of the guiding principle of technical naturalness, we restrict its applicability to non-fundamental phenomena in the realm of provisional theories within limited energy scales. In view of further breaches of autonomy of scales in apparently fundamental phenomena outside particle physics, the hierarchy problem of the Higgs mass is instead reinterpreted as an indication of the ontologically fundamental status of the Higgs boson. Applying the concept of robustness of theoretical elements under theory changes by Worrall and Williams justifies this seemingly contradictory attribution within the effective theories of the standard model of particle physics. Moreover, we argue that the ongoing naturalness debate about the Higgs mass is partly based on the adherence to the methodology of effective theories (often claimed to be universally applicable), for which there is no justification when dealing with presumably fundamental phenomena such as the Higgs mechanism, even if it is embedded into an effective theory.

physics.hist-ph

Stagnant Lakatosian Research Programmes

We propose an extension of the classical dichotomous categorization of research programmes into progress and degeneration according to Lakatos in the form of a neutral third category: the stagnant research programme. First, a critical examination of the primary literature with its often criticized definitional gaps justifies such a category. Through a generic derivation of criteria for stagnant programmes, a clear demarcation from progressive and degenerative ones is achieved. An empirical cross-check is subsequently employed for support: Both a series of examples from fundamental physics and a general analysis of today's research landscape also suggest on an empirical level the need to go beyond the traditional Lakatosian conception. Attributing stagnation is entirely in line with Lakatos' original intentions, which aimed not to hastily discard promising research but to exercise patience until the lifting of certain external constraints potentially enables progress once again.

physics.hist-ph

A not-too-simple solution to Goodman's New Riddle of induction

I review the works of Gärdenfors (1990) and Scorzato (2013) and show that their combination provides an elegant solution of Goodman's new riddle of induction. The solution is based on two main ideas: (1) clarifying what is expected from a solution: understanding that philosophy of science is a science itself, with the same limitations and strengths as other scientific disciplines; (2) understanding that the concept of complexity of a model's assumptions and the concept of direct measurements must be characterized together. Although both measurements and complexity have been the subject of a vast literature, within the philosophy of science, essentially no other attempt has been made to combine them. The widespread expectation, among modern philosophers, that Goodman's new riddle cannot be solved is not defensible without a serious exploration of such a natural approach. A clarification of this riddle has always been very important, but it has become even more crucial in the age of AI.

physics.hist-ph