Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.00335

Equations in Products of Free Groups and 3-Manifold Groups, I

Abstract

Perelman's proof of the Poincare conjecture shows that every simply connected closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. The fundamental groups of 3-manifolds attract lots of interest from mathematicians of different fields. As it was stated in a famous survey of Allen Hatcher "The classification of 3-manifolds", one would want to know exactly which groups occur as fundamental groups of these manifolds. The Stallings-Jaco-Hempel reformulation of the Poincare conjecture inspired several connections between low-dimensional topology, equations over free groups, and combinatorial group theory. The reformulation reduces the problem to study epimorphisms from the fundamental group of a closed orientable surface onto the direct product of two free groups (they correspond to Heegaard splittings of 3-manifolds and were named splitting homomorphisms). Olshankii (1989) constructed (in non-explicit form) first non-trivial examples of such splitting epimorphisms and verified the standardness of some of them. We construct up to equivalence all the splitting coordinate-surjective homomorphisms (among them, the genuine splitting epimorphisms are exactly those for which our constructed associated group balanced presentation is trivial). We give generators and relations of the corresponding balanced presentation (so all closed orientable 3-manifold groups) that can be studied by algebraic methods. We analyse a big class of such homomorphisms/presentations (including all Olshanskii's epimorphisms) and show that splitting epimorphisms are rare, in this case the corresponding balanced presentation of the trivial group can be reduced to the standard one by Andrews-Curtis transformations and the epimorphisms are standard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olga Kharlampovich, Alina Vdovina. 2026-08-12. Equations in Products of Free Groups and 3-Manifold Groups, I. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00335

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hyperfiniteness of boundary actions via tree decompositions

We study conditions for a countable group acting on a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph to induce a hyperfinite orbit equivalence relation on the Gromov boundary of the graph in terms of tree-decompositions of the graph. We prove that for a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph $X$ equipped with an action of a countable group $G$, if $(T, β)$ is a $G$-invariant tree-decomposition of $X$ such that each bag induces a connected subgraph $X_t$ of $X$ for each $t \in V(T)$, each adhesion set is finite and such that there are only finitely many $G$-orbits of edges of $T$, then the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on the Gromov boundary $\partial X$ is hyperfinite provided the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on $\partial T$ is hyperfinite and the orbit equivalence relations of the bag stabilizers acting on $\partial X_t$ are all hyperfinite. We show that the converse also holds if $(T, β)$ satisfies the additional property that each adhesion set distinguishes at least two ends of $X$.

math.GR

Compatible additions on a six-element commutative semigroup: equational bases and subvariety lattices

Let $M$ be the six-element commutative semigroup occurring as the common multiplicative reduct of the semirings $SR_6$ and $TR_6$. The closing paragraph of Shao, Ren, and Gao~\cite{ShaoRenGao2026} asks for the finite-basis and subvariety questions for the four remaining compatible additions on $M$. We answer these questions for the four isomorphism types $R_{01},R_{02},R_{11},R_{12}$. First, we classify all compatible additions on $M$: there are nine labelled additions and six isomorphism types, parametrized by $R_{ij}$ with $0\leq i\leq j\leq 2$. For each of the four new types we give a graph-theoretic criterion for every identity, an explicit infinite basis, and a proof of nonfinite basability. The generated varieties $\V(R_{01})$ and $\V(R_{02})$ have eleven subvarieties each, while $\V(R_{11})$ has sixty-six. The lattice $\Sub(\V(R_{12}))$ is countably infinite. Every identity in this variety reduces to a subset of twenty-five fixed identities together with two monotone path families $γ_n$ and $\gammaD_n$. This yields a canonical signature $(H,p,q)$, complete normal forms, explicit meet and join operations, and a formula for all covers. There are 153 fixed nodes, 43 one-parameter families, and 9 two-parameter families; exactly eighteen subvarieties are finitely based, and the unique limit subvariety is $\V(SR_6)$. The strong nonfinite-basis status of the four finite semirings remains open.

math.GR