Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.02868

Closed-Form PI and PID Tuning of All-Pole Plants up to Third Order for Monotonic Minimum-Settling Step Responses

Abstract

A unified, closed-form analytical PI/PID tuning method is presented for all-pole plants up to third order that yields a strictly monotonic (zero-overshoot) step response with minimum settling time. The design target is the binomial closed loop p^n/(s+p)^n, which is monotonic with robustness depending only on the order n. Because a fixed PI/PID cannot assign the closed-loop poles and the controller zeros independently, realizing this target exactly requires the controller zeros to be cancelled, which forces the controller numerator to divide the plant denominator. It follows that an exact, real-gained solution exists for any stable plant precisely up to second order with a PI controller and third order with a PID controller; beyond that the residual binomial factor acquires a complex pair of damping sqrt(3)/2, which a generic plant does not contain. Explicit gains are derived for first-order plants (PI), second-order plants with real and complex poles (PI and PID), and third-order plants with three real poles or one real pole plus a complex pair (PID). The freedom of the coincident designs is shown to be bounded: a quadratic nonnegativity condition gives the exact window of the design pole for strict monotonicity, which collapses at the pole-ratio-2 changeover for real poles and is nonempty for damping ratios above approximately 0.443 for complex poles. Monotonicity guarantees Mt = 1, hence Ms <= 2, phase margin >= 60 degrees, and gain margin >= 6 dB, tightening to universal constants for the binomial family. Load-disturbance attenuation obeys IAEd = 1/Ki, making the cost of cancellation explicit, and comparisons with SIMC, the CHR zero-overshoot rule, and deadbeat-fitted explicit formulas quantify the trade: at matched maximum sensitivity the proposed design settles faster than SIMC on the third-order example, with markedly lower controller gains and peak control effort.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Senol Gulgonul. 2026-06-11. Closed-Form PI and PID Tuning of All-Pole Plants up to Third Order for Monotonic Minimum-Settling Step Responses. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Constrained Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems via Approximate HJB and Control Barrier Functions

This paper presents a two-stage framework for constrained feedback control of input-affine nonlinear systems. Offline, an approximate value function for the unconstrained problem is computed, for example using Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB)-based policy iteration. Online, the proposed quadratic program (QP) minimizes the pre-Hamiltonian evaluated using the approximate value-function gradient subject to safety constraints enforced by control barrier functions (CBFs). This architecture decouples performance optimization from constraint enforcement, allowing constraints to be modified without recomputing the value function. As in CBF-QP architectures based on control Lyapunov functions (CLFs), safety is enforced as a hard constraint; however, the performance objective targets approximate optimality rather than a prescribed Lyapunov decay. Numerical results on a linear 2-state hovercraft and a nonlinear 9-state spacecraft attitude-control problem show agreement with the constrained open-loop optimal control problem (OCP) benchmark in the linear case, and performance close to the OCP benchmark, improving on CLF-based controllers, in the nonlinear case.

eess.SY

Rao-Blackwellized Stein Gradient Descent for Joint State-Parameter Estimation

We present a filtering framework for online joint state estimation and parameter identification in nonlinear, time-varying systems. The algorithm uses a Rao-Blackwellization technique to infer joint state-parameter posteriors efficiently. In particular, conditional state distributions are computed analytically via Kalman filtering, while model parameters, including the measurement-noise covariance, are approximated using particle-based Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD), enabling stable real-time inference. To handle parameters subject to physical constraints, we further introduce constrained variants that enforce them through an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) splitting of the SVGD update, including nonlinear equality constraints that standard particle filters cannot readily handle. We derive a stability bound that relates the approximation error in the parameter posterior to the resulting error in the marginal state distribution. Performance of the proposed filters is validated on three case studies: a fed-batch bioreactor with Haldane kinetics and a damped pendulum, both under physical constraints, and a neural-network-augmented dynamic system. The examples cover parameter estimation under inequality and equality constraints and online neural-network training within a dynamical model.

eess.SY

Firing Rate Neural Network Implementations of Model Predictive Control

Human and animal brains perform planning to enable complex movements and behaviors, a process that can be effectively described using model predictive control (MPC). How could the brain physically implement MPC? In this work, we translate model predictive controllers into firing rate neural networks, offering insights into the nonlinear neural dynamics that underpin planning. We propose a constructive method; no training is required. This is done first applying the projected gradient method to the dual problem to derive a baseline neural network implementation. We then use factorization and contraction analysis to systematically generate alternative network architectures; in other words, we systematically generate hypotheses for how planning is done in the brain via neural dynamics. Finally, we present numerical simulations to study different neural networks performing MPC to balance an inverted pendulum on a cart (i.e., balancing a stick on a hand), including one example in which imposing sparse connectivity (a property observed in brain networks) does not degrade control performance.

eess.SY