Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.03369

A calculus of types in Isbell nuclei

Abstract

We identify two constructions from different mathematical traditions. In linear logic and realisability, logical types are generated rather than fixed in advance: one begins with a universe of realisers equipped with execution, uses orthogonality to test their interactions, and takes types to be the biorthogonally closed subsets. In enriched Isbell duality, a quantitative relation induces an adjunction whose fixed points form a category, its nucleus. These constructions proceed by different means; we show that, in the present setting, they produce the same objects. The shared datum is minimal: an associative product, called execution, and a real-valued measurement, with no compatibility assumed between them. The failure of the measurement to be additive is at once the relation defining orthogonality and the quantitative relation whose Isbell nucleus we form, and the types cut out by orthogonality are exactly the fixed points of the associated adjunction. The identification pays off in both directions. The most natural product of types fails to be associative; repairing this failure forces a different notion of type, sensitive to both sides of a composite, on which the induced product is associative and, when execution has units, carries two residuals. What emerges is a noncommutative Lambek calculus, derived directly from execution and orthogonality rather than imposed. In the reverse direction, each such type, read on the categorical side, generates a quantitative relation of its own, and with it a derived adjunction and a further generation of types; these derived types are again types of the original situation, computed by the residuals of the Lambek calculus. We also prove a coherence theorem for the threefold arrangements of this construction and, in the finite-dimensional case, give explicit formulas for the product.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan Luis Gastaldi, Samantha Jarvis, Thomas Seiller, John Terilla. 2026-06-02. A calculus of types in Isbell nuclei. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03369

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Probabilistic Choreography Language for PRISM

We present a choreographic framework for modelling and analysing concurrent probabilistic systems based on the PRISM model-checker. This is achieved through the development of a choreography language, which is a specification language that allows to describe the desired interactions within a concurrent system from a global viewpoint. Using choreographies gives a clear and complete view of system interactions, making it easier to understand the process flow and identify potential errors, which helps ensure correct execution and improves system reliability. We equip our language with a probabilistic semantics and then define a formal encoding into the PRISM language and discuss its correctness. Properties of programs written in our choreographic language can be model-checked by the PRISM model-checker via their translation into the PRISM language. Finally, we implement a compiler for our language and demonstrate its practical applicability via examples drawn from the use cases featured in the PRISM website.

cs.LO

Monotone weak distributive laws over the lifted powerset monad in categories of algebras

Noticing the similarity between the monotone weak distributive laws combining two layers of nondeterminism in sets and in compact Hausdorff spaces, we study whether the latter law can be obtained automatically as a weak lifting of the former. This holds partially, but does not generalize to other categories of algebras: we then characterize when exactly monotone weak distributive laws over powerset monads in categories of algebras exist, exhibiting a law combining probabilities and non-determinism in compact Hausdorff spaces and showing on the other hand that such laws do not exist in a lot of other cases.

cs.LO

Identifying and Explaining (Non-)Equivalence of First-Order Logic Formulas

First-order logic is the basis for many knowledge representation formalisms and methods. Providing technological support for learning to write first-order formulas for natural language specifications requires methods to test formulas for (non-)equivalence and to provide explanations for non-equivalence. We propose such methods based on both theoretical insights and existing tools, implement them, and report on experiments testing their effectiveness on a large educational data set with > 100,000 pairs of first-order formulas.

cs.LO