Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.04934

The local complexity of certifying parity

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of locally certifying that the size of a network is even, or more generally, congruent to some fixed number. The parity property is one of the simplest global properties, and it plays an intriguing role in local certification. On the one hand, it is one of the simplest properties in cycles because it is equivalent to 2-colorability, and hence can be certified with a single bit. On the other hand, in general graphs, no non-trivial lower bound on the size of the certificates is known, and the known upper bound basically consists in certifying the \emph{exact} value of $n$. In addition, the nature of the problem makes all the known lower bound approaches fail. We uncover a surprising landscape for parity across different models and graph structures: * In general graphs equipped with identifiers, when allowing verification radius 2, parity can be certified with a constant number of bits. * But in the model of anonymous graphs and allowing verification radius only 1, parity requires $Ω(\log \log^*n)$ bits. * Finally, in bounded expansion graph classes (such as bounded-degree graphs and planar graphs), the lower bound does not apply: in the same restricted model we can design a constant-size certification. We introduce several new tools that we expect to be useful in other contexts, in particular ways to \emph{encode a parent at each node with a constant number of bits} (via implicit use of the IDs and conflict-free colorings) and a new lower bound technique, with complex topologies and higher-order Ramsey-type arguments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Jorge Valenzuela, Sébastien Zeitoun. 2026-06-03. The local complexity of certifying parity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reforge: Low-Latency Distributed GNN Serving with Selective Embedding Recomputation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely adopted for their ability to compute expressive node representations in graph datasets. However, serving GNNs on large graphs is challenging due to the high communication, computation, and memory overheads of constructing and executing computation graphs, which represent information flow across large neighborhoods. Existing approximation techniques in training can mitigate the overheads but, in serving, still lead to high latency and/or accuracy loss. To this end, we propose Reforge, a system that enables low-latency GNN serving for large graphs with minimal accuracy loss through two key ideas. First, Reforge employs selective recomputation of precomputed embeddings, which allows for reusing precomputed computation subgraphs while selectively recomputing a small fraction to minimize accuracy loss. Second, we develop computation graph parallelism, which reduces communication overhead by parallelizing the creation and execution of computation graphs across machines. Our evaluation with large graph datasets and GNN models shows that Reforge significantly outperforms state-of-the-art techniques.

cs.DC

Agentic AI Workload Characteristics

Agentic AI shifts LLM serving from isolated prompt-generation requests to stateful, multi-turn executions that repeatedly invoke the model, call tools, and grow context over time. This paper characterizes ReAct-style agents from both the LLM-serving and tool-execution perspectives using an end-to-end tracing infrastructure across reasoning and non-reasoning Gemma and Qwen configurations on five agentic benchmarks. Our study shows that agentic workloads are not simply long-prompt workloads: with effective context caching, most input tokens are reused across turns, making execution decode-dominated while increasing dependence on long-lived KV-cache state. We also find that tool use has a clear temporal structure, with agents shifting from read/explore behavior early in execution to execute/write behavior later. These results show that efficient agentic serving must jointly manage repeated model re-entry, persistent context state, and workload-dependent tool behavior.

cs.DC

Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB) with Constant-Size Message Metadata

Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB) is a fundamental primitive that guarantees agreement and validity in distributed systems subject to Byzantine faults, but it lacks ordering guarantees. In this paper, we address Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB), which builds on BRB to enforce causal message ordering. We present a novel BCRB protocol that decouples causal ordering from the BRB layer, achieving constant-size $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message metadata overhead and $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ communication word complexity as against $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity of existing protocols; here $n$ is the number of processes. We present two variants of our protocol: a cryptographic version using a threshold encryption scheme and sequence gating, and its non-cryptographic version. In the cryptographic version, senders broadcast ciphertexts immediately, and decryption shares are piggybacked on out-of-band ACKs, preventing early decryption and front-running. In both versions, causal safety is achieved probabilistically. We evaluate the probability of causal safety violations using a random variable path analysis under independent exponential link delay distributions. We show that both variants satisfy liveness and the probability of weak safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-3}\cdot\ln^3 f)$, where $f$ is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes, and $f < n/3$ and $f=\mathcal{O}(n)$. Further, for the crypto version, we show that the probability of strong safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-1} \cdot \ln^2 f)$. We also show how to modify our two protocols to guarantee 100\% weak safety keeping $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message space overhead but with $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ messages and $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity.

cs.DC