Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.06751

StageFrontier: Synchronization-Aware Stage Accounting for Distributed ML Training

Abstract

When a distributed training job slows down, the hard part is knowing where to look. Synchronization hides the cause: a stall on one rank shows up as a wait on the others, so a data delay on a single rank can surface as backward time across the group. The cheap dashboards that run all the time -- per-stage averages and maxima -- misread this, double-counting the same exposed delay or burying the slow rank in an average, while full profilers see it clearly but are far too heavy to leave on. StageFrontier is an always-on signal that closes this gap. Each rank reports only a short ordered vector of coarse stage durations -- data, forward, backward, and so on -- timed with CPU wall-clock, with no synchronized clocks and no kernel tracing. At each stage boundary, StageFrontier takes the cumulative time of whichever rank is furthest along; the increments of this frontier form an exact, additive accounting of the step's exposed time and point to the stage and rank where group-visible delay first appears, telling an operator where to aim a heavy profiler, not which fix to make. The accounting is exact, but the coarse signal alone cannot tell whether a leading stage truly caused the slowdown or merely ran alongside it; StageFrontier labels the windows where that distinction needs more evidence instead of guessing. A PyTorch implementation adds under 0.2% throughput overhead through 128 ranks on Gloo and NCCL, places injected faults among its top two suspects on all 50 rows of a hidden-rank DDP test, and recovers the same top-stage routing as PyTorch Profiler, HTA, and Nsight Systems once their traces are reduced to the same coarse stages -- from a 0.11 MB summary instead of a 15.81 GB trace.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boram Yoon, Wei Chen, Ville Kallioniemi. 2026-06-04. StageFrontier: Synchronization-Aware Stage Accounting for Distributed ML Training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06751

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reforge: Low-Latency Distributed GNN Serving with Selective Embedding Recomputation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely adopted for their ability to compute expressive node representations in graph datasets. However, serving GNNs on large graphs is challenging due to the high communication, computation, and memory overheads of constructing and executing computation graphs, which represent information flow across large neighborhoods. Existing approximation techniques in training can mitigate the overheads but, in serving, still lead to high latency and/or accuracy loss. To this end, we propose Reforge, a system that enables low-latency GNN serving for large graphs with minimal accuracy loss through two key ideas. First, Reforge employs selective recomputation of precomputed embeddings, which allows for reusing precomputed computation subgraphs while selectively recomputing a small fraction to minimize accuracy loss. Second, we develop computation graph parallelism, which reduces communication overhead by parallelizing the creation and execution of computation graphs across machines. Our evaluation with large graph datasets and GNN models shows that Reforge significantly outperforms state-of-the-art techniques.

cs.DC

Agentic AI Workload Characteristics

Agentic AI shifts LLM serving from isolated prompt-generation requests to stateful, multi-turn executions that repeatedly invoke the model, call tools, and grow context over time. This paper characterizes ReAct-style agents from both the LLM-serving and tool-execution perspectives using an end-to-end tracing infrastructure across reasoning and non-reasoning Gemma and Qwen configurations on five agentic benchmarks. Our study shows that agentic workloads are not simply long-prompt workloads: with effective context caching, most input tokens are reused across turns, making execution decode-dominated while increasing dependence on long-lived KV-cache state. We also find that tool use has a clear temporal structure, with agents shifting from read/explore behavior early in execution to execute/write behavior later. These results show that efficient agentic serving must jointly manage repeated model re-entry, persistent context state, and workload-dependent tool behavior.

cs.DC

Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB) with Constant-Size Message Metadata

Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB) is a fundamental primitive that guarantees agreement and validity in distributed systems subject to Byzantine faults, but it lacks ordering guarantees. In this paper, we address Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB), which builds on BRB to enforce causal message ordering. We present a novel BCRB protocol that decouples causal ordering from the BRB layer, achieving constant-size $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message metadata overhead and $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ communication word complexity as against $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity of existing protocols; here $n$ is the number of processes. We present two variants of our protocol: a cryptographic version using a threshold encryption scheme and sequence gating, and its non-cryptographic version. In the cryptographic version, senders broadcast ciphertexts immediately, and decryption shares are piggybacked on out-of-band ACKs, preventing early decryption and front-running. In both versions, causal safety is achieved probabilistically. We evaluate the probability of causal safety violations using a random variable path analysis under independent exponential link delay distributions. We show that both variants satisfy liveness and the probability of weak safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-3}\cdot\ln^3 f)$, where $f$ is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes, and $f < n/3$ and $f=\mathcal{O}(n)$. Further, for the crypto version, we show that the probability of strong safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-1} \cdot \ln^2 f)$. We also show how to modify our two protocols to guarantee 100\% weak safety keeping $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message space overhead but with $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ messages and $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity.

cs.DC