Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.09025

Continuous Cash-Overlay Filters for a Static Growth--Defensive Risk Sleeve: Slow-Tail Compensation, V-Shape Crash Brakes, Walk-Forward Validation, and Max-Cash Combination

Zheli Xiong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper studies a modular cash-overlay rule for allocating between a fixed growth-defensive risky sleeve R and interest-bearing cash C. The risky sleeve is a static 50/50 combination of equal-weight growth/technology and defensive income/value ETF baskets; the target is future R-C return, with the cash leg earning the contemporaneous cash rate. Two independent filters are tested. The slow-tail filter maps continuous compensation, rate-headwind, risk-premium-compression, and rate-path-stress states into a cash weight with a 30% material-trade gate. The V-shape filter is a fast crash brake based on continuous VIX, rate, credit, drawdown, and re-entry states. A fixed max-cash layer then uses the larger cash weight requested by either filter each day. On the 2017-2026 common window, the selected max-cash combination earns an 18.83% CAGR versus 16.62% for 100% R and reduces maximum drawdown from -33.59% to -18.05%. In the main walk-forward OOS window, the expanding combination earns 19.35% versus 17.59% for 100% R, with maximum drawdown of -22.05% versus -33.59%; the rolling version earns 18.50% with the same -22.05% drawdown. Post-2022 tests show lower drawdown but lower CAGR during a strong risky-sleeve rebound. The results support modular cash overlays as drawdown-control tools rather than standalone return-enhancement claims; fully real-time variable re-screening and multiple-testing-adjusted inference remain future work.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zheli Xiong. 2026-06-14. Continuous Cash-Overlay Filters for a Static Growth--Defensive Risk Sleeve: Slow-Tail Compensation, V-Shape Crash Brakes, Walk-Forward Validation, and Max-Cash Combination. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM↗