Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.09474

Training-Free Generalized Few-Shot Segmentation through Open-Vocabulary Semantic Arbitration

Abstract

Generalized Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation (GFSS) has traditionally been approached as a representation-learning problem, requiring task-specific adaptation to incorporate novel classes from limited support examples. Recent foundation models, however, already exhibit strong open-vocabulary recognition and segmentation capabilities, raising a different question: can GFSS be solved through inference-time coordination of frozen semantic priors rather than parameter adaptation? We answer this question with Open-V, a training-free GFSS framework that combines Segment Anything (SAM3) Promptable Concept Segmentation (PCS) with a K-shot CLIP support centroid through calibrated per-pixel semantic arbitration. OpenV introduces no trainable components and supports arbitrary semantic categories at inference time. Beyond segmentation performance, our study contributes three broader findings. First, we show that support information can be incorporated through inference-time semantic grounding, and that its contribution increases as foundation-model text priors weaken on label-disjoint vocabularies. Second, we identify a reproducibility confound in foundationmodel segmentation, demonstrating that preprocessing and evaluation-space mismatches can silently distort reported performance. Finally, we validate Open-V across PASCAL5i, COCO-20i, and ADE-OW, showing that training-free coordination of foundation-model priors generalizes across both conventional GFSS and open-vocabulary evaluation settings. On PASCAL-5i (1-shot), Open-V attains base/novel/harmonic mIoU of 78.4/77.5/77.9, without GFSS-specific training surpassing the strongest trained baseline by +17.7 HM.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Silas Kwabla Gah, Ebenezer Owusu. 2026-06-08. Training-Free Generalized Few-Shot Segmentation through Open-Vocabulary Semantic Arbitration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09474

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV