Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.11108

On the maximum and negative frustration indices of graphs

Maximilien Gadouleau·Huiying Zeng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A signed graph is a graph with signatures ($+1$ or $-1$) on its edges. A cycle is called positive if the product of its edge signatures is positive, and a signed graph is called balanced if each cycle in it is positive. The frustration index is the minimum number of edges whose deletion makes the signed graph balanced, which is considered to be a measurement of the imbalance of the signed graph. In this paper, we compare the frustration index of the all-negative signature with the maximum frustration index of all possible signatures on the unsigned graph. We classify some families of graphs into three scenarios: the all-negative signature does not maximise the frustration index, the all-negative signature maximises the frustration index non-uniquely, and the all-negative signature maximises the frustration index uniquely. For all three scenarios, we can exhibit chordal and non-chordal graphs alike. The classes we consider include apex trees, fan graphs, wheel graphs, and complete split graphs. Moreover, for the families of fan graphs and wheel graphs, we fully characterise and count the signatures maximising the frustration index. Throughout our study, we exhibit different classes of signed graphs for which the frustration index equals the number of edge-disjoint negative triangles. Moreover, as part of our study, we are able to refute three conjectures of Zaslavsky on the frustration index.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maximilien Gadouleau, Huiying Zeng. 2026-06-09. On the maximum and negative frustration indices of graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11108

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗