Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.15205

Scott Analysis below the Vaught Ordinal

Abstract

We develop new tools for determining the existence of models of specific Scott ranks under countability conditions. Using these, we improve a result of Sacks by showing that any counterexample to Vaught's conjecture must have at least two models of every parameterized Scott rank -- a result that contrasts with the unparameterized case, where minimal counterexamples have only one model at many ranks. We further prove that theories with fewer than continuum many models have trivial Scott spectra and provide a general, systematic classification of low Scott rank models when only countably many $Σ_α$-types are realized. Additionally, we classify the Scott complexity spectra for many Ehrenfeucht theories, and prove the $ω$-Vaught's conjecture in this setting, answering an infinitary strengthening of a question of Pillay and Tanović. We demonstrate that the Scott complexity of prime models for $ω$-stable first-order theories is commensurate with the complexity of the theory itself. Along the way, we apply our methods to concrete theories like p-groups, trees, and Boolean algebras, answering questions of Harris--Montalbán and Alvir--Csima--MacLean regarding specific structures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Gonzalez, Dino Rossegger, Dan Turetsky. 2026-08-26. Scott Analysis below the Vaught Ordinal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO