Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.16361

Monoidal categorification of generalized cluster algebras and conjectures of Fraser and Gleitz

Abstract

Hernandez and Leclerc introduced the notion of monoidal categorification of cluster algebras. We define similarly the notion of monoidal categorifications of generalized cluster algebras: an abelian monoidal category $\mathcal M$ is said to be a monoidal categorification of a generalized cluster algebra $\mathcal A$ if the Grothendieck ring of $\mathcal M$ is isomorphic to the upper generalized cluster algebra $\mathcal A^{\mathrm{up}}$, and if cluster monomials (resp. cluster variables) of $\mathcal A$ correspond to classes of real simple (resp. real prime simple) objects of $\mathcal M$. Let $\varepsilon$ be a root of unity such that $\varepsilon^{2\ell}=1$ for some $\ell\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 2}$. Denote by $\mathcal{C}_{\varepsilon}$ the category of finite-dimensional modules of the restricted quantum loop algebra $U_\varepsilon^{\res}(L\mathfrak{sl}_k)$ at root $\varepsilon$ of unity, and let $\mathcal{C}_{\varepsilon, ξ}$ be a full subcategory of $\mathcal{C}_{\varepsilon}$ determined by a bipartition $ξ: I \to \{0,1\}$ of the Dynkin diagram. For $k=3$, Gleitz conjectured that the Grothendieck ring of $\mathcal C_{\varepsilon,ξ}$ is isomorphic to a generalized cluster algebra of rank $2\ell-2$, and that generalized cluster monomials correspond to classes of simple modules. This conjecture is a special case of a more general conjecture of Fraser. In this paper, we prove the first part of Gleitz's conjecture. More precisely, for $k=3$ and arbitrary $\ell\ge2$, we prove that the Grothendieck ring of $\mathcal C_{\varepsilon,ξ}$ is isomorphic to a generalized cluster algebra of rank $2\ell-2$. We also classify the real Kirillov--Reshetikhin modules of $U^{\mathrm{res}}_\varepsilon(L\mathfrak{sl}_3)$ and obtain mutation sequences for the real Kirillov--Reshetikhin modules from the initial seed of the generalized cluster algebra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiao-Juan An, Jian-Rong Li, Yan-Feng Luo. 2026-07-07. Monoidal categorification of generalized cluster algebras and conjectures of Fraser and Gleitz. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16361

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A local relative trace formula for F*\SL(2,F)

In this note, we derive explicitly the local relative trace formula for the symmetric space F*\SL(2,F) at the level of Lie algebras, where F is a p-adic field of residue characteristic greater than two and F* is the set of invertible elements in F. This is perhaps one of the simplest non-trivial analogs of the trace formula, and also a motivating example for the author's work (in preparation) on the relative trace formula.

math.RT

Semi-infinite parabolic IC-sheaf

Let G be a connected reductive group, P its parabolic subgroup. We consider the parabolic semi-infinite category of sheaves on the affine Grassmanian of G and construct the parabolic version of the semi-infinite IC-sheaf of each orbit. We establish some of its properties and relate it to sheaves on the Drinfeld compactification of the moduli stack Bun_P of P-torsors on a curve. We also relate the parabolic semi-infinite IC-sheaf with the dual baby Verma object on the spectral side.

math.RT

The Grothendieck group of an extriangulated category

In this paper, we investigate the split Grothendieck group $K^{\rm sp}_{0}(\mathcal{M})$ of a $d$-rigid subcategory $\mathcal{M}$ in an extriangulated category $\mathscr{C}$. As applications, we prove the following results: (1) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a silting subcategory, then the Grothendieck group $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to $K_{0}^{\rm sp}(\mathcal{M})$; (2) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a $d$-cluster tilting subcategory, then $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to the index Grothendieck group $K_{0}^{\rm in}(\mathcal{M})$; (3) Let $\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d}$ be the $d$-cluster category of type $A_n$. If $d$ is even, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}/(n+1)\mathbb{Z}$. If $d$ is odd, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ if $n$ is odd; $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong 0$ if $n$ is even.

math.RT