Programming with Chebfun. Case study: Richards equation

Nicolae Suciu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.18118

Programming with Chebfun. Case study: Richards equation

Nicolae Suciu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Chebfun software system is a Matlab extension based on representations of (piece-wise) smooth one-variable functions by expansions in Chebyshev polynomials. One of Chebfun's attractive features is the ability to provide solutions to nonlinear boundary value problems (BVP) with accuracy close to the machine precision. This is done by the chebop class which provides automatic solutions by performing linearizations of the nonlinear BVP with a Newton method in function spaces and automatic differentiation. A drawback of chebop automatic approach is the possible lack of convergence of the Newton method if the initial guess is not close enough to the exact solution. An explicit functional Newton-Frechet linearization done for each particular shape of the differential operator (i.e. without automatic differentiation) proves to be more robust than the chebop class and allows an enlargement of the range of convergence. Another alternative is the implicit L-scheme (quasi-Newton approach with derivatives replaced by suitable positive constants L), with a much simpler implementation and globally convergent. Mixed methods L-scheme/chebop and L-scheme/Frechet may be used to speed up the computation while preserving the robustness and global convergence of the L-scheme. While chebop is the easiest way to solve BVPs, provided that it converges, the alternative approaches overcome the convergence issue, yielding accurate solutions to a wide class of steady-state one-dimensional problems governed by Richards equation. Chebfun2 and Chebfun3, which currently cannot solve BVPs, provide efficient tools for accuracy assessments of the unsteady solutions in one or two spatial dimensions obtained by classical discretization schemes.

Explore related subjects

math.NA cs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Nicolae Suciu. 2026-08-09. Programming with Chebfun. Case study: Richards equation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗

arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗

arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗