Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.24357

Bayesian Variable Selection in Generalized Linear Models

Abstract

Covariate selection in Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) is a fundamental problem in statistics, as including irrelevant predictors might lead to overfitting and poor interpretability, while omitting relevant ones might result in biased estimates. Most Bayesian approaches to variable selection -- including spike-and-slab priors and continuous shrinkage priors -- have key limitations, e.g., (i) are based on non fully conjugate formulations, (ii) are restricted to a linear model, or (iii) lack posterior consistency guarantees for the variable selection procedure and model parameters. In this work, we propose a fully Bayesian hierarchical and conjugate framework for covariate selection in GLMs, applicable to any distribution in the exponential family, based on modeling a binary inclusion indicator that directly encodes covariate inclusion in the linear predictor. In our approach, variable selection and parameter estimation are performed simultaneously, incorporating both sources of uncertainty in posterior inference. Consequently, our methodology provides a valid post-model Bayesian selection procedure. We present theoretical guarantees of the proposed fully conjugate Bayesian variable selection for GLMs, establishing posterior consistency of both the inclusion indicators and the active regression coefficients. We derive an efficient Gibbs Sampling algorithm with a corresponding R package implementation. We validate the proposed method on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating competitive predictive and inferential performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lucia Filippozzi, Iñigo Urteaga, Claudio Agostinelli. 2026-07-17. Bayesian Variable Selection in Generalized Linear Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME