Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.26441

GPUSparse: GPU-Accelerated Learned Sparse Retrieval with Parallel Inverted Indices

Ashutosh Sharma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Learned sparse retrieval models such as SPLADE achieve retrieval quality competitive with dense models while preserving the interpretability and exact-match advantages of sparse representations. However, inference-time scoring still relies on CPU-bound inverted index traversal algorithms (WAND, Block-Max WAND), creating a fundamental bottleneck for real-time serving at scale. We present GPUSparse, a system for GPU-accelerated exact learned sparse retrieval that introduces: (1) a GPU-parallel inverted index with block-aligned, warp-coalesced posting lists; (2) a batched scatter-add scoring algorithm that processes hundreds of queries simultaneously; and (3) fused Triton kernels with an analysis of the tradeoff between work-efficiency and hardware utilization. On MS MARCO passage ranking (8.8M passages) with real SPLADE embeddings, GPUSparse matches CPU exact scoring to three decimals (MRR@10=0.383, equal to Pyserini SPLADE at this precision; Recall@1000>=0.999 vs. dense matmul, the residual from floating-point tie-breaking) while providing a 235x speedup over Pyserini CPU at 8.8M documents (1.27ms vs. 298ms per query). Compared to Seismic (the fastest CPU sparse retrieval system), which trades 25% recall for speed (R@1000=0.738 vs. 0.983 exact), GPUSparse achieves exact scoring at 787 QPS throughput (batch 500) on the full 8.8M collection, with 1.3ms per query. Our document-parallel kernel reaches 62.6% of H100 peak HBM bandwidth, revealing a fundamental work-efficiency vs. bandwidth-efficiency tradeoff in GPU sparse retrieval. The reformulation of sparse scoring as scatter-add over an inverted index is shared with SPARe's iterative mode; our contribution is its fused-kernel realization, which we measure to be 23-270x faster than a faithful SPARe iterative reimplementation.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ashutosh Sharma. 2026-06-24. GPUSparse: GPU-Accelerated Learned Sparse Retrieval with Parallel Inverted Indices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Do Large Language Models Favor Recent Content? A Study on Recency Bias in LLM-Based Reranking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in information systems, including being used as second-stage rerankers in information retrieval pipelines, yet their susceptibility to recency bias has received little attention. We investigate whether LLMs implicitly favour newer documents by prepending artificial publication dates to passages in the TREC Deep Learning passage retrieval collections in 2021 (DL21) and 2022 (DL22). Across seven models, GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4, LLaMA-3 8B/70B, and Qwen-2.5 7B/72B, "fresh" passages are consistently promoted, shifting the Top-10's mean publication year forward by up to 4.78 years and moving individual items by as many as 95 ranks in our listwise reranking experiments. Although larger models attenuate the effect, none eliminate it. We also observe that the preference of LLMs between two passages with an identical relevance level can be reversed by up to 25% on average after date injection in our pairwise preference experiments. These findings provide quantitative evidence of a pervasive recency bias in LLMs and highlight the importance of effective bias-mitigation strategies.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

UniRec: Cross-stage Multi-Task Fusion with Preference Alignment for Cascaded Recommender Systems

Industrial recommender systems cascade stages with different objectives, feature spaces, and latency constraints. Optimizing pre-ranking and ranking separately induces cross-stage inconsistency: upstream models may filter out items preferred by downstream rankers, while independently tuned downstream fusion can offset upstream improvements. Most existing multi-task fusion methods target the ranking stage alone, and cross-stage methods often align with a downstream-derived score, leaving joint optimization of fusion modules across cascaded stages largely unexplored. We propose UniRec, a Unified Cross-stage Recommendation Fusion model. First, the two fusion agents partially share input embeddings in a single computation graph, allowing gradients from either stage to propagate through the shared representations. Second, a dual-axis preference alignment objective coordinates the two stages: horizontally, a compact aggregation term reorganizes dozens of pairwise objectives over heterogeneous prior signals into bidirectional preference evidence; vertically, a cross-stage consistency term transfers downstream pairwise preferences to the upstream fusion score. Third, we introduce attribute group-relative regularization, which computes relative advantages and normalizes policy updates within each attribute group, ensuring that uniformly promoting all items in a high-reward group provides no additional optimization gain. Offline experiments demonstrate UniRec consistently outperforms single-stage fusion and cross-stage coordination baselines; online A/B experiments show a 0.616% gain in app usage duration. UniRec has been fully deployed on the Kuaishou platform.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Scaling Articulated Rationales for MLLM-based Recommendation

We presented SARA, an industrial framework that transforms sparse articulated user rationales into scalable recommendation signals. Its data engine curates questionnaire responses into SARA-HQ, providing explicit preference supervision for aligning SARA-7B through SFT and Quality-Refining DPO. This alignment extends rationale generation from $86{,}564$ questionnaire-covered authors to the full $10$M-author space. SARA-Ranker translates the generated positive and negative rationales into features for user--author interaction modeling and negative-feedback history modeling, connecting articulated reasons to production ranking. Evaluation on unseen authors demonstrates that SARA-7B generates more specific, relevant, and grounded rationales than the evaluated general-purpose MLLMs. On top of a strong industrial ranking baseline with multimodal features, separate online A/B tests show that positive-rationale integration increases watch time by $0.99\%$, while negative-rationale integration reduces Hate feedback by $8.16\%$. Daily refresh and more than $30$ days of production deployment further demonstrate the operational feasibility of the approach. These findings establish articulated rationales as a useful complement to behavioral and content signals, and demonstrate a practical role for MLLMs in scaling sparse human explanations into preference information that improves industrial recommendation.

cs.IR↗