Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.27293

Deterministic Algorithms for Low Individual Degree Factors of Sparse Polynomials

Abstract

We study factoring algorithms for general sparse polynomials and sparse polynomials of bounded individual degree and prove the following results. 1. We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm which takes as input an $n$-variate $s$-sparse polynomial $f$ of bounded individual degree $d$ and outputs a list of circuits which contains all factors of $f$, although there might be additional spurious circuits in the list. The algorithm runs in time $\operatorname{poly}(n, s^d)$. Additionally, every circuit in the list has constant depth. Our algorithm works over all fields of characteristic 0 or sufficiently large characteristic. Our result generalizes a recent result of Chuyoon and Shpilka that gives a $\operatorname{poly}(n, s^d)$-time algorithm for recovering all sparse factors of $f$ (without spurious factors). As a corollary, we can also recover all factors of $f$ in time $\operatorname{poly}(n, s^{d^2 \log n})$, and recover the algorithmic result of Bhargava, Saraf and Volkovich and its improvement by Chuyoon and Shpilka. Both the above consequences follow from known interpolation and divisibility testing techniques. 2. We give a deterministic quasipolynomial-time algorithm which takes as input a general $n$-variate $s$-sparse polynomial $f$ of (unbounded) individual degree $D$ and outputs a list of polynomials which contains all factors of $f$ that have bounded individual degree $d$. The algorithm runs in time $\operatorname{poly}(D^{d \log s}, s^{d^2 \log n})$ and works over arbitrary fields. The list may again contain spurious elements. Our result strengthens results of Dutta, Sinhababu and Thierauf and Kumar, Ramanathan and Saptharishi which give algorithms to recover all factors of $f$ of bounded total degree. A consequence of our algorithm is a new upper bound on the total number of bounded individual degree factors of a sparse polynomial.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Somnath Bhattacharjee, Rishabh Kothary, Shanthanu S. Rai, Shubhangi Saraf. 2026-06-25. Deterministic Algorithms for Low Individual Degree Factors of Sparse Polynomials. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC