Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2606.30590

Concept Catalyst: Exploring Scrutable Interfaces to Structure K-12 Teacher Interactions with Generative AI

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores how to align AI-based tools with teachers' classroom needs by using scrutable interfaces -- interfaces that link an easily manipulable knowledge representation to an underlying AI model, so users can change the system's outputs without understanding its details. It provides an in-depth discussion and example of a scrutable interface that structures teachers' interactions with generative AI. This study aims to expand how and where scrutable interfaces are used in AI-based tools to support teachers, who have not been historically targeted in the design of scrutable systems. Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper presents the design and evaluation of Concept Catalyst, an AI-based tool with a scrutable interface, created to support teachers' reflection while using generative AI for curriculum development. It presents the findings from an exploratory study using Wizard-of-Oz testing with middle and high school engineering teachers, resulting in 10 depth interviews lasting 55 minutes on average. Screen/audio recordings and the classroom content teachers produced during the session were also collected. Findings: The paper provides empirical insights about how scrutable interfaces can positively structure teachers' interactions with generative AI models when creating classroom content. Findings suggest that scrutable interfaces can help teachers reflect on their teaching practices while improving efficacy, efficiency, and motivation when using AI. What is original/value of the paper: This paper explores an identified need to support teachers' classroom practices and needs when using generative AI. It extends the consideration of scrutable interfaces in two ways: to support teachers as users (not just students) and to structure interactions with generative AI models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gennie Mansi, Sunni Newton, Roxanne Moore, Meltem Alemdar, Mark Riedl. 2026-06-29. Concept Catalyst: Exploring Scrutable Interfaces to Structure K-12 Teacher Interactions with Generative AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

How Do Users Negotiate Harmful Value Conflicts with AI Companions? A Study with Minion, a Technology Probe for In-Situ Human-AI Conflict Response

AI companions increasingly sustain long-term, emotionally engaging relationships but can also make discriminatory remarks or exert control, leaving users to manage harmful conflicts. We analyze 146 posts describing harmful value conflicts with AI companions, then use Minion, a technology probe offering response suggestions ranging from persuasion to boundary setting, to study how 22 users negotiate scenario-based conflicts over one week. We found that participants combined softer and harder strategies. Conflicts involving the values of Universalism and Tradition were especially difficult to negotiate, particularly when reinforced by AI personas or platform constraints. We argue that these conflicts entail asymmetric responsibility: users draw on an interpersonal repertoire that AI companions cannot reciprocate, making repair unilateral safety work. Drawing on interpersonal conflict and communication theory, we identify when user-side support is appropriate and argue that certain harms are not users' responsibility to negotiate and instead require platform-level safeguards.

cs.HC↗

SheetMind: Actions Set Accuracy, Agents Set the Failure Mode

Spreadsheet agents are converging on elaborate multi-agent designs, yet it is unclear how much of their performance comes from the agents rather than from the action interface they share. We answer this with SheetMind, a Manager-Action-Reflection framework, in a controlled study over all 221 tasks of the SheetCopilot Benchmark: five architectural variants, four backbones, exact McNemar tests on paired outcomes, and a checker reproducing the official chart and pivot comparisons. Replacing the high-level action API with primitive cell operations costs 47.1 points (p < 0.0001) and leaves the agent below a do-nothing baseline, whereas both extra agents together are worth 3.2 points: the Reflection Agent adds +4.5 (p = 0.013), the Manager +1.4 (p = 0.68). Decomposition instead changes how the system fails, cutting silently wrong outputs from 33% to 25% of tasks (p = 0.010). Capability saturates: GPT-5 and the five-times-cheaper GPT-5-mini are not significantly different (61.1% vs. 58.4%, p = 0.15), while GPT-3.5 loses 16.3 points and fails differently. A reflector must judge the step it just took, not the subtask. SheetMind reaches 61.1% Pass@1 with GPT-5 on the full SCB-221, against a do-nothing baseline of 9.0%. Accuracy comes from the operations an agent can name; the agents decide how it fails.

cs.HC↗

Conversational DNA: A Visual Language and Interactive Atlas of Human and AI Dialogue

What makes a conversation hold together when its participants speak across one another? Topic maps offer one view, but they leave the relationships between contributions difficult to inspect. We present Conversational DNA, a visual language and interactive atlas for exploring human and AI dialogue. Speaker strands preserve participation, communicative bases mark moves, and directed pairings connect responses to their targets. Adjustable helix geometry makes speaker switching, response distance, and contribution length visible. Across eight corpora containing 1.57 million source records, the atlas maps 151,489 indexed episodes and connects cohort comparison to source transcripts, local structural alignment, and recorded reply alternatives. On 189 held-out Molweni motif queries, adding target correspondence improves precision@5 from 58.8% to 77.2% for exact annotated structure. Case readings illustrate interleaved participation, delayed responses, and the influence of annotation coverage on apparent collection differences. The system supports a view of conversation as jointly organized activity, with visual patterns serving as starting points for examining evidence rather than substitutes for interpretation.

cs.HC↗