Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.30782

A Lean 4 Formalization of Scott's Continuous Lattices (1972)

Abstract

We present a complete machine-checked formalization of Dana Scott's landmark 1972 paper \emph{Continuous Lattices} \textbf{[Sco72]}, carried out in Lean 4 against mathlib and including the March 1972 Milner correction in \textbf{[Sco72]} (pp.~135--136). Scott's paper develops a model for \(λ\)-calculus from a topological starting point. He defines \emph{injective} \(T_0\)-spaces -- those with a strong extension property for continuous maps -- and shows that they are exactly the \emph{continuous lattices}: complete lattices whose Scott topology is determined by the order via the way-below relation (\(\ll\)). On this foundation he studies projections, retractions, products, function spaces, and inverse limits. The capstone (Theorem 4.4) constructs an inverse limit \(D_\infty\) of function-space approximants and proves \(D_\infty \cong [D_\infty \to D_\infty]\), yielding a purely mathematical model for Church's untyped \(λ\)-calculus. Our development formalizes \textbf{43 numbered results} from Scott's Sections 1--4 (Propositions, Corollaries, Lemmas, and Theorems), each as a sorry-free Lean theorem, together with supporting infrastructure (step functions, the \(\Uparrow a\) basis of Scott opens, Milner's coarser-than-Scott hypothesis, the function-space tower, and the \(i_\infty\)/\(j_\infty\) pair). The formalization is \textbf{classical} (uses \texttt{Classical.choice} transitively) and follows Scott's proof dependency order. Where the Lean proof required choices not visible in the original -- or where dead ends were encountered -- we record detailed notes in Section 5. All proofs check with the standard footprint \(\texttt{[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]}\). The formalization has been accepted into the Palomar registry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lars Warren Ericson. 2026-09-06. A Lean 4 Formalization of Scott's Continuous Lattices (1972). https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30782

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO