Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.31606

Sign Laws and Mock Theta Functions

Abstract

Let \[ ρ(q)=\sum_{m\geq 0}\frac{q^{2m(m+1)}}{(1+q+q^2)(1+q^3+q^6)\cdots(1+q^{2m+1}+q^{4m+2})} =\sum_{n\geq 0}r(n)q^n \] be Ramanujan's third order mock theta function. We prove the sign law \[ r(3m)>0,\qquad r(3m+1)\leq 0,\qquad r(3m+2)\leq 0, \] with equality precisely at $n=2,4,8,11,20$. Watson's identity \[ 2ρ(q)+ω(q)=T(q) \] reduces the problem to comparing the mock theta function $ω(q)$ with the eta quotient \[ T(q)=3\frac{(q^6;q^6)_\infty^4}{(q^3;q^3)_\infty^2(q^2;q^2)_\infty}. \] We prove effective root-of-unity estimates for this difference. The polar contributions at $q=1$ cancel, the contribution at $q=-1$ is polynomially bounded, and the first surviving exponential term occurs at the primitive cubic roots of unity. It has the sign pattern \[ κ_0=\frac13\cos\fracπ{18}>0,\qquad κ_1=-\frac13\sin\frac{2π}{9}<0, \qquad κ_2=-\frac13\sin\frac\pi9<0. \] The resulting effective asymptotic proves the desired sign law for all sufficiently large $n$, and an exact integer-arithmetic verification completes the finite range. We conclude by indicating how the same root-of-unity method should lead to analogous sign laws for other third order mock theta functions, including $ϕ(q)$ and $χ(q)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manosij Ghosh Dastidar. 2026-06-30. Sign Laws and Mock Theta Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31606

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT