Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.00066

Learning Expert Strategy for Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Intervention via Decoupled Procedural Execution

Abstract

Endovascular interventions are high-stakes procedures requiring precise device operation within complex and tortuous vascular anatomies. Autonomous endovascular navigation has the potential to standardize procedural quality and reduce the performance variability inherent in manual operation. Although Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches have demonstrated promise in enabling autonomy in endovascular intervention, they often struggle with explicit constraint satisfaction and safety guarantees. To address these challenges, a learning-based expert strategy is introduced, enhancing procedural consistency in autonomous endovascular intervention by explicitly decoupling high-level strategic decision-making from low-level procedural execution. The proposed framework replicates the expert clinical decision-making process: a strategic RL policy generates global navigation intents, which are subsequently refined through an expert-informed execution module. This module ensures that robot movements strictly adhere to expert operational norms, real-time kinematic limits, and vessel safety constraints. Experimental evaluation across high-fidelity 3D simulations and a real-world robotic platform demonstrates that the proposed framework not only outperforms baseline policies but also effectively replicates expert-level proficiency. The framework achieves a high navigation success rate (> 96%) and a 29.3% reduction in operational steps, which translates to enhanced operative efficiency and minimized device-vessel interaction. Furthermore, a 13% reduction in trajectory variance indicates superior procedural standardization, aligning autonomous behavior with established clinical norms. These results underscore its potential to enhance the predictability, safety, and consistency of robotic endovascular interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yanxi Chen, Tianliang Yao, Shaolong Tang, Jiyuan Zhao, Hengyu Hu, Zhaoxing Li, Antonio J. Sánchez Egea, Peng Qi. 2026-06-30. Learning Expert Strategy for Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Intervention via Decoupled Procedural Execution. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00066

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO