Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.00561

A reduction principle for non-$r$-partite spectral extremal problems, with a complete multipartite classification

Abstract

A graph is non-$r$-partite if its chromatic number exceeds $r$. For an edge-color-critical graph $F$ with $χ(F)=r+1$, let $\mathrm{ex}_{r+1,ρ}(n,F)$ be the maximum adjacency spectral radius among non-$r$-partite $F$-free graphs of order $n$, and let $\mathrm{EX}_{r+1,ρ}(n,F)$ and $\mathrm{EX}_{r+1}(n,F)$ be the families of such graphs attaining, respectively, this maximum spectral radius and the maximum number of edges $\mathrm{ex}_{r+1}(n,F)$. Fang and Lin conjectured that $\mathrm{EX}_{r+1,ρ}(n,F)\subseteq\mathrm{EX}_{r+1}(n,F)$ for every such $F$ and all large $n$. We prove a reduction principle: if $F$ is \emph{$s$-embeddable} and $\mathrm{ex}_{r+1}(n,F)=|E(T_{n,r})|-\lfloor n/r\rfloor+2(s-1)$, where $T_{n,r}$ is the Turán graph, then the inclusion holds and, moreover, the spectral extremal graph is unique. The reduction replaces the spectral problem by an edge-counting one, and its proof rests on a direct comparison of secular functions together with a second-order residual refinement of the Rayleigh principle. We then determine the spectral extremal graphs for all edge-color-critical complete multipartite forbidden graphs. For $F=K_{1,1,t_3,\ldots,t_{r+1}}$ with $t_3,\ldots,t_{r+1}\ge 2$ we show \[ \mathrm{ex}_{r+1}(n,F)=|E(T_{n,r})|-\Bigl\lfloor\frac nr\Bigr\rfloor+2(t_{\min}-1), \qquad t_{\min}:=\min\{t_3,\ldots,t_{r+1}\}, \] for all sufficiently large $n$, and we identify the unique spectral extremal graph; in particular $\mathrm{EX}_{r+1,ρ}(n,F)\subseteq\mathrm{EX}_{r+1}(n,F)$. The endpoint $t_3=1$ lies outside the embeddability framework and is treated by a separate argument: for $F=K_{1,1,1,t_4,\ldots,t_{r+1}}$ with $r\ge3$, the unique non-$r$-partite spectral extremal graph is $Y_r(n)$, obtained through a saturation reduction followed by the spectral refinement of Turán's theorem. The complete graph $K_{r+1}$ and the complete split graph $B_{r,q}$

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Suil O, Jiadong Wu. 2026-07-13. A reduction principle for non-$r$-partite spectral extremal problems, with a complete multipartite classification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO