Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction

Yurui Zheng; Ying Jin

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.02206

Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction

Yurui Zheng·Ying Jin

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Predictions are increasingly used to guide high-stakes decisions, from treatment selection to policy making. To ensure reliability with imperfect predictions, uncertainty quantification methods such as conformal prediction build prediction sets with coverage guarantees. However, statistical validity alone does not immediately determine the decisions to take, nor the optimality thereof. This gap is especially delicate in counterfactual settings where the outcome that materializes depends on the action taken, so uncertainty cannot be specified independently of the decision rule. We develop a decision-theoretic framework for uncertainty-informed counterfactual decisions. We identify a novel notion of \emph{policy-coupled coverage} -- namely, coverage of the realized outcome under the action induced by the prediction sets themselves -- as the optimal and lossless interface between uncertainty and action. It plays three roles. First, it justifies acting via a natural max-min rule as minimax-optimal under distributional ambiguity. Second, optimizing prediction sets under policy-coupled coverage is equivalent both to a stronger universal-coverage formulation and to the direct risk-averse optimization over policies and utility certificates; this equivalence yields the explicit form of the population-optimal prediction sets. Third, it admits a two-stage procedure, Policy-Coupled Risk-Averse Conformal Prediction (PC-RACP), that approximates these optimal sets with rigorous finite-sample coverage. Simulations and a real email-marketing experiment confirm that PC-RACP delivers higher utility than existing approaches while maintaining valid coverage, and that ignoring the counterfactual structure of the decision problem is suboptimal for both validity and utility.

Explore related subjects

stat.ML cs.LG math.ST stat.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yurui Zheng, Ying Jin. 2026-07-02. Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02206

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Attack-Resistant Uniform Fairness for Linear and Smooth Contextual Bandits

Modern digital platforms use contextual bandits to allocate valuable exposure and opportunities among competing participants. Fair treatment is therefore an important concern, yet reward maximization alone does not ensure that preferential allocation reflects participants' merits. We develop algorithms for linear and smooth contextual bandits under uniform merit-based fairness, requiring the reward ordering to justify preferential allocation across all contexts and rounds, and study how these guarantees are affected by adversarial reward corruption. Our algorithms achieve $(1-\widetilde O(1/T))$-fairness, with regret that is minimax optimal among fair policies for linear rewards and nearly minimax optimal for smooth rewards. In the linear setting, matching lower bounds identify the price of fairness exactly: minimax regret increases from $\log T$ to $\log^2 T$. For smooth rewards, the cost of fairness is at most polylogarithmic. We further establish a separation between regret and fairness robustness: an $\widetilde O(1)$ corruption budget can cause substantial fairness violations without worsening the regret order. We therefore develop robust algorithms that adapt sampling, estimation, and fairness certification to corruption, which preserve uniform fairness and achieve minimax-optimal and nearly optimal regrets for linear and smooth rewards, respectively. Numerical and semi-synthetic experiments illustrate these findings.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

The Cost of Privacy: Rates of Convergence for Parameter Estimation with Differential Privacy

We study the minimax cost of $(\varepsilon,δ)$-differential privacy for mean estimation and Gaussian linear regression in low and high dimensions. For low-dimensional mean estimation, a resampling reduction to fingerprinting yields the privacy contribution $d^2\log(1/δ)/(n^2\varepsilon^2)$ in the stated polynomial-$δ$ regime. For low-dimensional regression, a tracing argument gives the contribution $d^2/(n^2\varepsilon^2)$ under an explicit approximate-DP remainder condition. For sparse mean estimation and sparse regression, a constant-weight packing and a private Fano lemma produce an effective privacy entropy of order $\min\{s\log(ed/s),[\log((e^\varepsilon-1)/δ)]_+\}$ for $δ>0$, up to universal constants and a fixed threshold; for pure DP it is $s\log(ed/s)$. Thus, when $δ$ is polynomially smaller than $\varepsilon$, the pure-DP dependence is retained up to polylogarithmic factors whenever the effective dimension is polylogarithmic in $n$, including regimes with $\varepsilon=o(1)$. Coordinatewise-clipping estimators for means and split-sample noisy-gradient estimators for regression attain the lower bounds up to explicit logarithmic factors. Simulations and data examples illustrate related implementations.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

Robust Mixture Models for Algorithmic Fairness Under Latent Heterogeneity

Machine learning models optimized for average performance can perform poorly on vulnerable subpopulations. Existing approaches often rely on groups specified in advance, yet fairness-relevant subgroup structure may be latent, intersectional, and driven by complex interactions among continuous and discrete attributes. We introduce \textbf{ROME} (\textbf{\underline{RO}}bust \textbf{\underline{M}}ixture \textbf{\underline{E}}nsemble), a framework that learns latent group structure while optimizing worst-group predictive performance. ROME connects latent-variable modeling with distributionally robust optimization (DRO) through two complementary approaches: an Expectation-Maximization formulation with robust aggregation for linear models and a neural Mixture-of-Experts formulation for nonlinear settings. Across simulations and three real-world regression datasets, ROME improves worst-group performance while maintaining competitive overall accuracy, including in comparisons with established group-aware and group-label-free robust learning methods. ROME provides a flexible approach to robust prediction when fairness-relevant attributes are available for subgroup discovery but their direct use in group-specific outcome models is restricted.

stat.ML↗