Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.05415

How Stable Is a PNT Resilience Score? Decision-Instability of Single-Number Resilience Ratings under Framework-Aligned Weighting

Chakshu Baweja
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Authoritative positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) resilience frameworks (the DHS Resilient PNT Conformance Framework, RPCF, and peers) define what resilience means but supply only self-attestation: a checklist or a maturity Level, with no engine and no measurement. We build the missing measurement layer as an open, deterministic scoring engine over a PNT simulator, emitting per-dimension sub-scores traceable to a scenario and an oracle, and ask whether a single composite score or maturity Level is a stable basis for a decision. Across seven architectures spanning cross-dimension tradeoffs, a Dirichlet simplex over the seven RPCF categories, and a five-threat ensemble, the answer splits in two. The composite winner is stable under active denial and under near-equal weightings (about 1 percent flip rate), so a single number is safe precisely where one design dominates; but re-weighting alone flips it in up to 22 percent of draws under nominal conditions, where designs contend, a known composite-indicator sensitivity. The sharper, weighting-invariant failure is categorical: a weakest-link maturity Level (our minimum-over-categories operationalization of the RPCF ladder, not the framework's rule) depends on the threat assumed, not the architecture, changing for one architecture in seven. Because the composite rewards declared techniques, a constructed single-band receiver declaring all seven outscores a more resilient system: self-attestation can be gamed by declaration. And apparent fourfold GNSS redundancy reduces, by the definition of a shared common-mode failure domain, to an effective diversity of one. Conclusions hold under +/-20 percent perturbation of every driver within the reduction. We report per-dimension sub-scores with provenance and a rank range, not a phantom single number. A self-assessment aligned to RPCF v2.0, not a certification.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chakshu Baweja. 2026-06-22. How Stable Is a PNT Resilience Score? Decision-Instability of Single-Number Resilience Ratings under Framework-Aligned Weighting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05415

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

UPPRESSO: Untraceable and Unlinkable Privacy-PREserving Single Sign-On Services

Single sign-on (SSO) allows a user to maintain only the credential for an identity provider (IdP) to log into multiple relying parties (RPs). However, SSO introduces privacy threats, as (a) a curious IdP could track a user's all visits to RPs, and (b) colluding RPs could learn a user's online profile by linking her identities across these RPs. This paper presents a privacypreserving SSO scheme, called UPPRESSO, to protect an honest user's online profile against (a) an honest-but-curious IdP and (b) malicious RPs colluding with other users. UPPRESSO proposes an identity-transformation approach to generate untraceable ephemeral pseudo-identities for an RP and a user from which the target RP derives a permanent account for the user, while the transformations also provide unlinkability. This approach protects the identities of the user and the target RPs in a login flow, while working compatibly with widely-deployed SSO protocols and providing services accessed from a commercial-off-the-shelf browser without plug-ins or extensions. We built a prototype of UPPRESSO on top of MITREid Connect, an open-source SSO system. The extensive evaluations show that it fulfills the security and privacy requirements of SSO with reasonable overheads.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Attack Tree Distance: a practical examination of tree difference measurement within cyber security

Attack trees are a popular threat modeling method. In practice, there is often a need to compare attack tree models produced by human experts, based on both the structure of the tree and the meaning of the node labels. In this work, we investigate the problem of comparing attack trees and measuring their similarity. We define five different measures for measuring the distance between two attack trees: Label Distance (LD), Tree Edit Distance (TED), Radical Distance (RD), Multiset Distance (MSD) and Weighted Sum Distance (WSD). We further propose a repeatable method of both theoretical and experimental attack tree distance measures validation. Our theoretical validation consists of a series of basic transformations to evaluate the behavior of distance measures with respect to specific types of transformations that may appear between two attack trees. To experimentally validate our distance measures, we designed and executed a human study ($n=39$) to collect a dataset of attack trees to be used for evaluation and comparison of the measures. From our theoretical and experimental results, we find that applying semantic similarity as a means of comparing node labels is a valid approach. Further, we find four of the five attack tree distance measures are valid approaches in certain, varying circumstances. Our results suggest that these methods can already be used to identify similar real-world attack trees. Overall, this work lays the groundwork for improved threat model analysis, validation of AI-generated attack trees, and future research into threat similarity measurement in cybersecurity.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Probabilistic Modeling of Jailbreak on Multimodal LLMs: From Quantification to Application

Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated their superior ability in understanding multimodal content. However, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which exploit weaknesses in their safety alignment to generate harmful responses. Previous studies categorize jailbreaks as successful or failed based on whether responses contain malicious content. However, given the stochastic nature of MLLM responses, this binary classification of an input's ability to jailbreak MLLMs is inappropriate. Derived from this viewpoint, we introduce jailbreak probability to quantify the jailbreak potential of an input, which represents the likelihood that MLLMs generated a malicious response when prompted with this input. We approximate this probability through multiple queries to MLLMs. After modeling the relationship between input hidden states and their corresponding jailbreak probability using Jailbreak Probability Prediction Network (JPPN), we use continuous jailbreak probability for optimization. Specifically, we propose Jailbreak-Probability-based Attack (JPA) that optimizes adversarial perturbations on input image to maximize jailbreak probability, and further enhance it as Multimodal JPA (MJPA) by including monotonic text rephrasing. To counteract attacks, we also propose Jailbreak-Probability-based Finetuning (JPF), which minimizes jailbreak probability through MLLM parameter updates. Extensive experiments show that (1) (M)JPA yields significant improvements when attacking a wide range of models under both white and black box settings. (2) JPF vastly reduces jailbreaks by at most over 60\%. Both of the above results demonstrate the significance of introducing jailbreak probability to make nuanced distinctions among input jailbreak abilities.

cs.CR↗